Foundations of biology

AI-generated keywords: Foundations of Biology

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Lack of laws in biology and descriptive nature of fundamental biological entities
  • Need to reconsider logical content and principles of biology
  • Inquiry into foundations of biology using elements, logic, and principles from other disciplines
  • Introduction of concepts such as symmetry, asymmetry, necessity, and contingency to revise Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason
  • Explanation on how theories or laws of nature are developed in biology
  • Identification of four fundamental theories: cell theory, Darwin's theory of natural selection, informational theory (including Mendel's theory on inheritance), and physico-chemical theory
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jean-Louis Sikorav, Alan Braslau, Arach Goldar

arXiv: 1401.3203v2 - DOI (q-bio.OT)
14 pages,2 tables

Abstract: It is often stated that there are no laws in biology, where everything is contingent and could have been otherwise, being solely the result of historical accidents. Furthermore, the customary introduction of fundamental biological entities such as individual organisms, cells, genes, catalysts and motors remains largely descriptive; constructive approaches involving deductive reasoning appear, in comparison, almost absent. As a consequence, both the logical content and principles of biology need to be reconsidered. The present article describes an inquiry into the foundations of biology. The foundations of biology are built in terms of elements, logic and principles, using both the language and the general methods employed in other disciplines. This approach assumes the existence of a certain unity of human knowledge that transcends discipline boundaries. Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason is revised through the introduction of the complementary concepts of symmetry and asymmetry and of necessity and contingency. This is used to explain how these four concepts are involved in the elaboration of theories or laws of nature. Four fundamental theories of biology are then identified: cell theory, Darwin's theory of natural selection, an informational theory of life (which includes Mendel's theory of inheritance) and a physico-chemical theory of life. Atomism and deductive reasoning are shown to enter into the elaboration of the concepts of natural selection, individual living organisms, cells and their reproduction, genes as well as catalysts and motors. This work contributes to clarify the philosophical and logical structure of biology and its major theories. This should ultimately lead to a better understanding of the origin of life, of system and synthetic biology, and of artificial life.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Jan. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1401.3203v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The existing summary discusses the lack of laws in biology and the descriptive nature of fundamental biological entities. It suggests that the logical content and principles of biology need to be reconsidered. The article describes an inquiry into the foundations of biology, using elements, logic, and principles from other disciplines. It introduces the concepts of symmetry, asymmetry, necessity, and contingency to revise Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason. These concepts are then used to explain how theories or laws of nature are developed. The article identifies four fundamental theories of biology: cell theory, Darwin's theory of natural selection, an informational theory of life (including Mendel's theory on inheritance), and a physico-chemical theory of life. It shows how atomism (the belief that everything is composed of small indivisible particles) and deductive reasoning play a role in developing these theories. The work aims to clarify the philosophical and logical structure of biology and its major theories, leading to a better understanding of the origin of life, system and synthetic biology, and artificial life. In this context, "Foundations of Biology" by Jean-Louis Sikorav, Alan Braslau, and Arach Goldar explores the lack of laws in biology and proposes a reconsideration of the logical content and principles in this field. The authors argue that while fundamental biological entities are often described descriptively rather than through deductive reasoning approaches, it is necessary to use elements from other disciplines to build a foundation for biology. They introduce concepts such as symmetry, asymmetry, necessity, and contingency to revise Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason. These concepts are then applied to explain how theories or laws in biology are developed. The authors identify four fundamental theories: cell theory, Darwin's theory on natural selection; an informational theory including Mendel's theory on inheritance); and a physico-chemical theory.
Created on 24 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.