Scale Congestion Control to Ultra-High Speed Ethernet

AI-generated keywords: Ethernet congestion control ultra-high-speed networks Adaptive Sliding Mode algorithm bandwidth expansion

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Ethernet is widely used in various networking environments such as LANs, datacenters, enterprise networks, storage networks, and high-performance computing.
  • The increasing demand for Ethernet at speeds of 40Gbps and 100Gbps (potentially up to 400Gbps) highlights the need for effective congestion control mechanisms.
  • Ultra-high-speed Ethernet poses challenges like amplifying small delays due to increased bandwidth delay product.
  • Existing congestion control standards like QCN may not be sufficient for ultra-high-speed networks.
  • The Adaptive Sliding Mode (ASM) congestion control algorithm has been proposed to address these challenges effectively.
  • ASM offers simplicity, stability, rapid convergence processes, resilience against delays, and adaptability to fluctuating bandwidth.
  • Real experiments and simulations have shown that ASM outperforms traditional QCN in performance.
  • ASM leverages the derivative of queue length for rate adjustment as a crucial indicator of available bandwidth versus sending rates.
  • Maintaining the congestion control system at the congestion boundary line ensures automatic stabilization towards a steady state.
  • The development of ASM contributes significantly to enhancing congestion control in ultra-high-speed networks and provides insights for refining other algorithms in similar contexts.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Wanchun Jiang, Fengyuan Ren, Xin Yue, Chuang Lin

Abstract: Currently, Ethernet is broadly used in LAN, datacenter and enterprise networks, storage networks, high performance computing networks and so on. Along with the popularity of Ethernet comes the requirement of enhancing Ethernet with congestion control. On the other hand, Ethernet speed extends to 40Gbps and 100Gbps recently, and even 400Gbps in the near future. The ultra-high speed requires congestion control algorithms to adapt to the broad changes of bandwidth, and highlights the impacts of small delay by enlarging the bandwidth delay product. The state-of-art standard QCN is heuristically designed for the 1Gbps and 10Gbps Ethernet, and unaware of the challenges accompanying the ultra-high speed. To scale congestion control to ultra-high speed Ethernet, we propose the Adaptive Sliding Mode (ASM) congestion control algorithm, which is simple, stable, has fast and smooth convergence process, can tolerate the impacts of delay and adapt to the wide changes of bandwidth. Real experiments and simulations confirm these good properties and show that ASM outperforms QCN. Designing ASM, we find that the derivative of queue length is helpful to rate adjustment because it reflects the difference between bandwidth and aggregated sending rate. We also argue for enforcing congestion control system staying at the congestion boundary line, along which it automatically slides to stable point. These insights are also valuable to develop other congestion control algorithms in ultra-high speed networks.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 May. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1405.1127v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of networking, Ethernet has become a ubiquitous technology used in LANs, datacenters, enterprise networks, storage networks, and high-performance computing environments. As the demand for Ethernet continues to grow, there is a pressing need to enhance it with effective congestion control mechanisms. The recent evolution of Ethernet speeds to 40Gbps and 100Gbps (with projections reaching up to 400Gbps) underscores the necessity for congestion control algorithms that can seamlessly adapt to these rapid bandwidth expansions. The advent of ultra-high-speed Ethernet brings forth unique challenges related to congestion management. One critical aspect is the amplification of small delays due to the increased bandwidth delay product. While existing standards like QCN have been tailored for lower speed variants such as 1Gbps and 10Gbps Ethernet, they may not be equipped to address the complexities associated with ultra-high-speed networks. To address this gap and scale congestion control mechanisms effectively for ultra-high-speed Ethernet networks, a novel approach known as Adaptive Sliding Mode (ASM) congestion control algorithm has been proposed. This algorithm offers simplicity, stability, rapid and smooth convergence processes, resilience against delay impacts, and adaptability to wide fluctuations in bandwidth. Through real experiments and simulations, it has been demonstrated that ASM surpasses the performance of traditional QCN. A key insight driving the design of ASM is leveraging the derivative of queue length for rate adjustment. This derivative serves as a crucial indicator of the disparity between available bandwidth and aggregated sending rates. Furthermore, advocating for maintaining the congestion control system at the congestion boundary line ensures automatic stabilization towards a steady state. The findings from developing ASM not only contribute significantly to enhancing congestion control in ultra-high-speed networks but also offer valuable insights for refining other algorithms in similar contexts.
Created on 19 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.