The existing summary describes the challenges faced by a university department in manually handling communication with potential students. Due to the large number of applications received each year, it is not feasible to have one-to-one conversations with every student. This process requires significant time and effort from academic staff members who have to search for suitable answers and contact each student individually. To address this issue, the project aims to develop a chatbot that can reduce the burden on the head of admissions and other users. The chatbot will utilize an algorithm to search through a set of data and provide potential answers to user queries. If the user is not satisfied with the answer, the program will also provide relevant web links for further information. The project includes the development of a web interface for both users and an administrator. To prepare for the project, a literature review was conducted along with an investigation of existing tools. Consultation with the head of admissions helped establish the requirements of the system. Various algorithms and tools were explored, including keyword and template matching. Ultimately, an algorithm combining keyword matching with string similarity was developed. The project has successfully implemented a usable system using this algorithm. To evaluate its effectiveness, logs of questions and answers were kept, and feedback from potential students who used it was collected. In summary, this research paper titled "Chatbot for admissions" by Nikolaos Polatidis addresses the manual communication challenges faced by university departments when dealing with potential students. It proposes developing a chatbot as a solution to reduce costs and save time for academic staff members involved in admissions processes. The paper outlines how an algorithm combining keyword matching with string similarity was devised to search through data sets and find suitable answers while providing relevant web links if needed. The implementation of this system was evaluated through question logs and feedback from potential students who interacted with it in order to assess its effectiveness.
- - Challenges faced by a university department in manually handling communication with potential students
- - Large number of applications received each year makes one-to-one conversations with every student infeasible
- - Development of a chatbot to reduce burden on the head of admissions and other users
- - Chatbot utilizes an algorithm to search through data and provide potential answers to user queries
- - Provides relevant web links for further information if user is not satisfied with the answer
- - Development of a web interface for both users and an administrator
- - Literature review, investigation of existing tools, and consultation with head of admissions conducted to establish system requirements
- - Algorithm combining keyword matching with string similarity developed for effective searching through data sets
- - Usable system successfully implemented using the developed algorithm
- - Evaluation conducted through question logs and feedback from potential students who used the chatbot
A university department had a hard time talking to many students who wanted to join. They made a robot that can talk to the students instead. The robot looks for answers in its memory and gives them to the students. If the students don't like the answer, it gives them links to more information. The robot can be used on a computer by both the students and someone in charge. The people who made the robot looked at other tools and talked to the person in charge before making it. They also made sure it works well by asking questions and getting feedback from students."
Definitions- University: A place where people go to learn after they finish high school.
- Department: A group of people who work together on something specific, like talking to potential students.
- Chatbot: A kind of robot that can talk with people using a computer or phone.
- Algorithm: A set of instructions that tells a computer what to do.
- Web interface: A way for people to use something on the internet, like a website.
- Administrator: Someone who is in charge of something, like managing the chatbot system.
- Literature review: Reading and learning about what other people have written about a topic.
- Investigation: Looking into something carefully to find out more about it.
- System requirements: The things that need to be done or included in order for something to work well.
- Usable system: Something that is easy for people to use and works well.
- Evaluation: Checking if something is
Chatbot for Admissions: A Solution to Manual Communication Challenges
The manual communication process between university departments and potential students is a challenge due to the large number of applications received each year. Academic staff members have to search for suitable answers and contact each student individually, which requires significant time and effort. To address this issue, Nikolaos Polatidis proposed developing a chatbot as a solution in his research paper titled "Chatbot for admissions". This article will discuss the project's objectives, implementation, evaluation and results.
Objectives
The main objective of this project was to develop a chatbot that could reduce the burden on the head of admissions and other users by utilizing an algorithm to search through data sets and provide potential answers to user queries. The system also had to include a web interface for both users and an administrator.
Implementation
Before beginning development, Polatidis conducted a literature review along with an investigation of existing tools. He then consulted with the head of admissions in order to establish the requirements of the system. Various algorithms were explored including keyword matching and template matching before ultimately deciding on one combining keyword matching with string similarity. The project successfully implemented such a system using this algorithm which was evaluated through question logs kept during its usage as well as feedback from potential students who interacted with it in order to assess its effectiveness.
Results
The results showed that the chatbot was successful in reducing costs associated with manually handling communication processes while saving time for academic staff members involved in admissions processes. It was also able to provide relevant web links if needed when providing answers so that potential students could find more information about their query if they weren't satisfied with what they were given initially by the chatbot itself.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this research paper provides insight into how implementing automated systems can help streamline manual communication processes between university departments and potential students while reducing costs associated with such tasks at hand as well as saving time for academic staff members involved in these processes. It demonstrates how such systems can be developed using algorithms combining keyword matching with string similarity which can be further improved upon based on feedback collected from those who use them regularly or interact with them frequently enough so that their effectiveness can be assessed accurately over time.