Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling

AI-generated keywords: Recurrent Neural Networks Gated Units Sequence Modeling LSTM GRU

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper compares various types of recurrent units in RNNs, focusing on LSTM and GRU units with a gating mechanism.
  • Evaluation is based on tasks related to polyphonic music modeling and speech signal modeling.
  • Results indicate that LSTM and GRU outperform traditional tanh units.
  • GRU performs similarly to LSTM in the evaluation.
  • The research was presented at the NIPS 2014 Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop, offering insights into the effectiveness of different recurrent units in sequence modeling within neural networks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, Yoshua Bengio

Presented in NIPS 2014 Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop

Abstract: In this paper we compare different types of recurrent units in recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Especially, we focus on more sophisticated units that implement a gating mechanism, such as a long short-term memory (LSTM) unit and a recently proposed gated recurrent unit (GRU). We evaluate these recurrent units on the tasks of polyphonic music modeling and speech signal modeling. Our experiments revealed that these advanced recurrent units are indeed better than more traditional recurrent units such as tanh units. Also, we found GRU to be comparable to LSTM.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Dec. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1412.3555v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling" compares various types of recurrent units in RNNs. Specifically, the authors Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio focus on advanced units with a gating mechanism - long short-term memory (LSTM) units and gated recurrent units (GRU). Their evaluation is based on tasks related to polyphonic music modeling and speech signal modeling. The results show that these sophisticated recurrent units outperform traditional tanh units. Additionally, the study finds that GRU performs similarly to LSTM. This research was presented at the NIPS 2014 Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop and provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different recurrent units in sequence modeling within neural networks.
Created on 07 Aug. 2024
Available in other languages: fr

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.