Project Risk Management Model Based on PRINCE2 and Scrum Frameworks

Authors: Martin Tomanek, Jan Juricek

The International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), January 2015, Volume 6, Number 1, ISSN: 0975-9018
AI-generated keywords: Risk Management Agile Software Development Scrum PRINCE2 Integrated Framework

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Formal risk management techniques are needed in agile software development methods, particularly Scrum.
  • Managing risks is important in agile project management.
  • The authors conducted a survey to gain a better understanding of current practices in agile project management.
  • An integrated framework combining Scrum and PRINCE2 with a focus on risk management is discussed in the paper.
  • Enriching Scrum with selected practices from PRINCE2 can lead to improved results in delivering software products, especially for global development projects.
  • This study provides valuable insights for organizations looking to enhance their risk management strategies while adopting agile methodologies such as Scrum.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: There is a lack of formal risk management techniques in agile software development methods Scrum. The need to manage risks in agile project management is also identified by various authors. Authors of this paper conducted a survey to find out the current practices in agile project management. Furthermore authors discuss the new integrated framework of Scrum and PRINCE2 with focus on risk management. Enrichment of Scrum with selected practices from the heavy-weight project management framework PRINCE2 promises better results in delivering software products especially in global development projects.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Feb. 2015

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1502.03595v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Project Risk Management Model Based on PRINCE2 and Scrum Frameworks," Martin Tomanek and Jan Juricek highlight the need for formal risk management techniques in agile software development methods, particularly Scrum. They emphasize the importance of managing risks in agile project management, which has been identified by various authors. To gain a better understanding of current practices in agile project management, the authors conducted a survey. The paper further discusses an integrated framework combining Scrum and PRINCE2 with a focus on risk management. The authors suggest that enriching Scrum with selected practices from the heavy-weight project management framework PRINCE2 can lead to improved results in delivering software products, especially for global development projects. This study provides valuable insights for organizations looking to enhance their risk management strategies while adopting agile methodologies such as Scrum.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.