Predicting and increasing subjective well-being: response function model and rhythmic movement therapy

Authors: Irina Malkina-Pykh

arXiv: 1507.01891v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)

Abstract: Background. The objective of the present study was to apply the nonlinear response function model of subjective well-being (RFSWB model) to evaluate the outcome of rhythmic movement therapy (RMT) for increasing subjective well-being and to analyze whether intervention-related changes in several psychological variables were mechanisms underlying SWB increase in subjects participating in RMT group. Methods. A total of 273 subjects (54 males and 219 females, mean age was 37.3(SD=10.5) years) were selected at random in nonclinical population and assessed with the appropriate surveys and questionnaires. The RMT program was proposed to the 105 subjects (24 males, 81 females, and mean age 37.6(SD=11.7) years) with very low, low and medium SWB level. Control group was included. Findings. Results revealed that: a) substantial changes in SWB and underlying psychological state were observed among the participants as a result of RMT intervention; b) RFSWB model predicts the changes in SWB after RMT intervention satisfactorily and can help to identify the reliable predictors of success.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Jul. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1507.01891v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 07 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.