Galactic dark matter search via phenomenological astrophysics modeling

AI-generated keywords: Gamma-ray signatures

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on identifying gamma-ray signatures of annihilating galactic dark matter
  • Utilizes D$^{3}$PO algorithm to reconstruct diffuse gamma-ray sky from Fermi data
  • Confirms dark matter annihilation-like signal in inner Galaxy
  • Investigates morphology of regions supporting dark matter component
  • Caution advised in attributing observed signals to dark matter annihilation
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xiaoyuan Huang, Torsten Enßlin, Marco Selig

JCAP 1604 (2016) no.04, 030
arXiv: 1511.02621v2 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
17 pages, 11 figures, matches version published in JCAP

Abstract: Previous searches for the $\gamma$-ray signatures of annihilating galactic dark matter used predefined spatial templates to describe the background of $\gamma$-ray emission from astrophysical processes like cosmic ray interactions. In this work, we aim to establish an alternative approach, in which the astrophysical components are identified solely by their spectral and morphological properties. To this end, we adopt the recent reconstruction of the diffuse $\gamma$-ray sky from Fermi data by the D$^{3}$PO algorithm and the fact that more than 90\% of its flux can be represented by only two spectral components, resulting form the dense and dilute interstellar medium. Under these presumptions, we confirm the reported DM annihilation-like signal in the inner Galaxy and derive upper limits for dark matter annihilation cross sections. We investigate whether the DM signal could be a residual of the simplified modeling of astrophysical emission by inspecting the morphology of the regions, which favor a dark matter component. The central galactic region favors strongest for such a component with the expected spherically symmetric and radially declining profile. However, astrophysical structures, in particular sky regions which seem to host most of the dilute interstellar medium, obviously would benefit from a DM annihilation-like component as well. Although these regions do not drive the fit, they warn that a more detailed understanding of astrophysical $\gamma$-ray emitting processes in the galactic center region are necessary before definite claims about a DM annihilation signal can be made. The regions off the Galactic plane actually disfavor the best fit DM annihilation cross section from the inner Galactic region unless the radial decline of the Galactic DM density profile in the outer regions is significantly steeper than that usually assumed.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Nov. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1511.02621v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In this study, the authors delve into the search for gamma-ray signatures of annihilating galactic dark matter using a novel approach that focuses on identifying astrophysical components based on their spectral and morphological properties. Departing from previous methodologies that relied on predefined spatial templates to describe background gamma-ray emissions from processes like cosmic ray interactions, the researchers leverage the D$^{3}$PO algorithm's recent reconstruction of the diffuse gamma-ray sky from Fermi data. Remarkably, they find that over 90% of the flux can be represented by just two spectral components originating from the dense and dilute interstellar medium. By adopting these presumptions, the team confirms a dark matter annihilation-like signal in the inner Galaxy and proceeds to derive upper limits for dark matter annihilation cross sections. They meticulously investigate whether this signal could stem from oversimplified modeling of astrophysical emission by scrutinizing the morphology of regions favoring a dark matter component. Notably, while the central galactic region exhibits strong support for such a component with an anticipated spherically symmetric and radially declining profile, other areas hosting significant amounts of dilute interstellar medium also show potential benefits from a dark matter annihilation-like component. However, despite these intriguing findings, caution is advised before definitively attributing the observed signals to dark matter annihilation. The authors emphasize that a more comprehensive understanding of astrophysical gamma-ray emitting processes in the galactic center region is imperative to make conclusive claims about a dark matter annihilation signal. Furthermore, regions situated off the Galactic plane tend to disfavor the best-fit dark matter annihilation cross section derived from observations in the inner Galactic region unless there is a significantly steeper radial decline in the assumed Galactic dark matter density profile in outer regions. Overall, this study sheds light on innovative approaches to probe galactic dark matter through phenomenological astrophysics modeling and underscores the importance of refining our understanding of both astrophysical emissions and potential dark matter signals within our galaxy.
Created on 16 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.