Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision

AI-generated keywords: Inception Architecture Computer Vision Convolutional Networks Computational Efficiency Resource Constraints

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Trend towards very deep networks since 2014 with impressive performance on various benchmarks
  • Importance of computational efficiency and low parameter count in applications like mobile vision and big-data scenarios
  • Proposal of innovative methods such as factorized convolutions and rigorous regularization techniques to efficiently scale up networks
  • Significant progress demonstrated over existing models on the ILSVRC 2012 classification challenge validation set
  • Achievement of top-1 error rate of 21.2% and top-5 error rate of 5.6% using a network with specific computational cost and parameter count
  • Impressive results through ensemble modeling and multi-crop evaluation, showcasing effectiveness in pushing boundaries while maintaining efficiency
  • Emphasis on optimizing network architectures for improved performance in real-world applications with resource constraints
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe, Jonathon Shlens, Zbigniew Wojna

Abstract: Convolutional networks are at the core of most state-of-the-art computer vision solutions for a wide variety of tasks. Since 2014 very deep convolutional networks started to become mainstream, yielding substantial gains in various benchmarks. Although increased model size and computational cost tend to translate to immediate quality gains for most tasks (as long as enough labeled data is provided for training), computational efficiency and low parameter count are still enabling factors for various use cases such as mobile vision and big-data scenarios. Here we explore ways to scale up networks in ways that aim at utilizing the added computation as efficiently as possible by suitably factorized convolutions and aggressive regularization. We benchmark our methods on the ILSVRC 2012 classification challenge validation set demonstrate substantial gains over the state of the art: 21.2% top-1 and 5.6% top-5 error for single frame evaluation using a network with a computational cost of 5 billion multiply-adds per inference and with using less than 25 million parameters. With an ensemble of 4 models and multi-crop evaluation, we report 3.5% top-5 error on the validation set (3.6% error on the test set) and 17.3% top-1 error on the validation set.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Dec. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1512.00567v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision" by Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe, Jonathon Shlens, and Zbigniew Wojna explores advancements in convolutional networks that have transformed computer vision solutions. The authors highlight the trend towards very deep networks since 2014 and their impressive performance on various benchmarks. While larger models and increased computational costs usually lead to better results with sufficient labeled data for training, the importance of computational efficiency and low parameter count cannot be ignored in applications like mobile vision and big-data scenarios. To address this issue, the authors propose innovative methods such as factorized convolutions and rigorous regularization techniques to efficiently scale up networks. By evaluating their approaches on the ILSVRC 2012 classification challenge validation set, they demonstrate significant progress over existing models. Specifically, they achieve a top-1 error rate of 21.2% and a top-5 error rate of 5.6% using a network with a computational cost of 5 billion multiply-adds per inference and less than 25 million parameters. Additionally, through an ensemble of four models and multi-crop evaluation, they report an impressive top-5 error rate of 3.5% on the validation set (3.6% on the test set) and a top-1 error rate of 17.3% on the validation set. This showcases the effectiveness of their approach in pushing the boundaries of computer vision capabilities while maintaining computational efficiency. The study emphasizes the significance of optimizing network architectures for improved performance in real-world applications where resource constraints are prevalent.
Created on 07 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.