Dust grains from the heart of supernovae

AI-generated keywords: Dust grains AGB stars Supernovae GRASH_Rev code Reverse shock

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Dust grains are believed to form in the winds of AGB stars and supernovae (SNe).
  • To determine the importance of these two sources, it is crucial to understand how much freshly formed dust in SN ejecta can survive the passage of the reverse shock and be injected into the interstellar medium.
  • A team led by M. Bocchio developed a new code called GRASH_Rev that allows for tracking the dynamics of dust grains in shocked SN ejecta and computing their time evolution with respect to mass, composition, and size distribution.
  • The team studied four well-known SNe in the Milky Way and LMC: SN 1987a, Cas A, Crab Nebula, and N49. They found good agreement between their simulated models and observations.
  • Between 10% and 40% of initial dust mass has already been destroyed by the reverse shock in three SNe studied.
  • The largest destruction will occur between 10^3 and 10^5 years after explosions.
  • Only between 1% and 8% of currently observed mass will survive due to age limitations.
  • Understanding how much dust survives from newly formed SNe is essential for accurately predicting galactic evolution over cosmic time scales.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: M. Bocchio, S. Marassi, R. Schneider, S. Bianchi, M. Limongi, A. Chieffi

arXiv: 1601.06770v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)

Abstract: Dust grains are classically thought to form in the winds of AGB stars. However, nowadays there is increasing evidence for dust formation in SNe. In order to establish the relative importance of these two classes of stellar sources of dust it is important to know what is the fraction of freshly formed dust in SN ejecta that is able to survive the passage of the reverse shock and be injected in the interstellar medium. With this aim, we have developed a new code, GRASH_Rev, that allows to follow the dynamics of dust grains in the shocked SN ejecta and to compute the time evolution of the mass, composition and size distribution of the grains. We consider four well studied SNe in the Milky Way and LMC: SN 1987a, Cas A, the Crab Nebula, and N49. For all the simulated models, we find good agreement with observations. Our study suggests that SN 1987A is too young for the reverse shock to have affected the dust mass. Conversely, in the other three SNe, the reverse shock has already destroyed between 10 and 40% of the initial dust mass. However, the largest dust mass destruction is predicted to occur between 10^3 and 10^5 yr after the explosions. Since the oldest SN in the sample has an estimated age of 4800 yr, current observations can only provide an upper limit to the mass of SN dust that will enrich the interstellar medium, the so-called effective dust yields. We find that only between 1 and 8% of the currently observed mass will survive. This is in good agreement with the values adopted in chemical evolution models which consider the effect of the SN reverse shock. We discuss the astrophysical implications of our results for dust enrichment in local galaxies and at high redshift.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jan. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1601.06770v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Dust grains have long been believed to form in the winds of AGB (asymptotic giant branch) stars, but recent evidence suggests that they may also form in supernovae (SNe). To determine the relative importance of these two sources of dust, it is crucial to understand what fraction of freshly formed dust in SN ejecta can survive the passage of the reverse shock and be injected into the interstellar medium. To address this question, a team led by M. Bocchio developed a new code called GRASH_Rev that allows for tracking the dynamics of dust grains in shocked SN ejecta and computing their time evolution with respect to mass, composition, and size distribution. The team studied four well-known SNe in the Milky Way and LMC: SN 1987a, Cas A, Crab Nebula, and N49. They found good agreement between their simulated models and observations. Their study showed that while SN 1987A is too young for its reverse shock to have affected its dust mass, between 10% and 40% of initial dust mass has already been destroyed by the reverse shock in the other three SNe. However, they predict that the largest destruction will occur between 10^3 and 10^5 years after explosions. Since current observations can only provide an upper limit on effective dust yields due to age limitations (the oldest SN in their sample has an estimated age of 4800 years), they found that only between 1% and 8% of currently observed mass will survive. This result agrees with values adopted in chemical evolution models that consider the effect of SN reverse shocks. The team discussed astrophysical implications for dust enrichment both locally and at high redshifts based on their findings. They concluded that understanding how much dust survives from newly formed SNe is essential for accurately predicting galactic evolution over cosmic time scales.
Created on 06 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.