In their influential paper, Philipp Brandes and Roger Wattenhofer build upon the groundbreaking work of Frey and Osborne by delving deeper into the automation of jobs. They take a closer look at the tasks that make up each job in the O*NET database and recognize that these tasks are interconnected, shedding light on the likelihood of computerization for a particular job. By utilizing a linear program, they assign probabilities to individual tasks while ensuring that related tasks have similar probabilities. This approach not only refines existing results but also provides a more comprehensive understanding of which aspects of a job are most susceptible to automation. Such granular analysis allows both experts and laymen to better critique and refine findings, ultimately leading to more accurate assessments of the impact of automation on various occupations. Through their study, Brandes and Wattenhofer aim to open up the "black box" created by Frey and Osborne's initial research, offering insights into which specific tasks within a job are at risk of being automated in an increasingly technology-driven world.
- - Philipp Brandes and Roger Wattenhofer build upon Frey and Osborne's work on job automation
- - They analyze tasks in the O*NET database to determine likelihood of computerization for each job
- - Utilize a linear program to assign probabilities to individual tasks, ensuring related tasks have similar probabilities
- - Granular analysis provides a more comprehensive understanding of job automation susceptibility
- - Aims to refine existing results and offer insights into specific tasks at risk of automation
Summary1. Philipp Brandes and Roger Wattenhofer studied how likely jobs are to be done by computers.
2. They looked at tasks in a big database to see which ones could be done by computers.
3. They used a special program to decide how likely each task is to be done by a computer.
4. By looking closely at tasks, they learned more about which jobs might be automated.
5. Their goal is to improve what we know about automation and find out which tasks might be done by computers.
Definitions- Job automation: When machines or computers do work that people used to do.
- Database: A place where lots of information is stored and organized.
- Probabilities: The chances of something happening.
- Granular analysis: Looking very closely at details or small parts of something.
- Susceptibility: How easily something can be affected or changed.
The Automation of Jobs: A Closer Look at the Tasks Within
In recent years, there has been much discussion about the impact of automation on jobs. With advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, many fear that machines will replace human workers, leading to widespread unemployment. This concern was first brought to light by Frey and Osborne in their groundbreaking paper "The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?" However, Philipp Brandes and Roger Wattenhofer take this research a step further by delving deeper into the tasks that make up each job in the O*NET database.
Understanding Job Automation
Frey and Osborne's study utilized data from the O*NET database to assess the likelihood of computerization for various occupations. They found that 47% of US jobs were at high risk of being automated in the next two decades. While this research sparked important discussions about job automation, it left many questions unanswered. Brandes and Wattenhofer recognized that not all tasks within a job are equally susceptible to automation and set out to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
The Interconnectedness of Tasks
Brandes and Wattenhofer's approach differs from previous studies as they focus on individual tasks rather than entire occupations. They recognize that tasks within a job are interconnected and cannot be analyzed independently. For example, while some aspects of a job may be easily automated, others may require human skills such as creativity or empathy.
To account for this interconnectedness, Brandes and Wattenhofer utilize a linear program which assigns probabilities to individual tasks while ensuring related tasks have similar probabilities. This method allows for a more nuanced analysis as it considers both technical feasibility (the ability for machines to perform certain tasks) as well as economic feasibility (whether it is cost-effective for companies to automate these tasks).
A More Accurate Assessment
By taking a closer look at the tasks within each job, Brandes and Wattenhofer's research refines existing results and provides a more accurate assessment of which aspects of a job are most susceptible to automation. This granular analysis allows both experts and laymen to better critique and refine findings, ultimately leading to more accurate assessments of the impact of automation on various occupations.
Opening the "Black Box"
One of the main contributions of Brandes and Wattenhofer's study is that it opens up the "black box" created by Frey and Osborne's initial research. While their study provided valuable insights into overall job automation, it did not offer specific details about which tasks within a job were at risk. By focusing on individual tasks, Brandes and Wattenhofer shed light on which specific aspects of a job are most likely to be automated in an increasingly technology-driven world.
The Importance of Granular Analysis
Brandes and Wattenhofer's research highlights the importance of conducting granular analysis when studying job automation. By breaking down jobs into individual tasks, we can gain a better understanding of which aspects are most susceptible to automation. This information is crucial for policymakers, educators, and individuals looking to prepare for future changes in the workforce.
Moreover, this type of analysis allows for more targeted solutions. Instead of fearing widespread unemployment due to automation, policymakers can focus on reskilling workers in areas that are less likely to be automated or creating policies that support workers who may be displaced by technology.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Philipp Brandes and Roger Wattenhofer have built upon previous research by delving deeper into the tasks that make up each job in the O*NET database. Their approach offers a more comprehensive understanding of which aspects within a job are most susceptible to automation while also allowing for more accurate assessments. By opening up the "black box" of job automation, their study provides valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and individuals looking to prepare for the future of work.