The conventional wisdom of mean-variance (MV) portfolio theory suggests that the relationship between risk and diversification follows a decreasing asymptotic function, where the asymptote represents the level of portfolio systematic risk or undiversifiable risk. However, this literature assumes that investors hold an equally-weighted or MV portfolio and measure diversification using portfolio size. These approaches are only optimal if asset returns distribution is exchangeable or if investors have no useful information about asset expected return and risk. Surprisingly, this question has never been addressed in current literature. This paper by Gilles Boevi Koumou aims to fill this gap by revisiting Markowitz's MV model and examining the impact of full information about asset expected return and risk on diversification. The author explores scenarios where both the risk-free rate is available and when it is not. By addressing these overlooked aspects, this research provides a theoretical analysis of risk reduction and diversification within MV portfolio theory. The findings from this study will contribute to a better understanding of how investors can optimize their portfolios when they have complete knowledge about asset expected return and risk, considering both risky assets and the role of the risk-free asset.
- - Conventional wisdom of mean-variance (MV) portfolio theory assumes decreasing asymptotic relationship between risk and diversification
- - Literature assumes equally-weighted or MV portfolio and measures diversification using portfolio size
- - This paper fills the gap by examining impact of full information about asset expected return and risk on diversification within MV model
- - Explores scenarios with and without risk-free rate availability
- - Theoretical analysis of risk reduction and diversification within MV portfolio theory
- - Findings contribute to understanding how investors can optimize portfolios with complete knowledge about asset return and risk, considering risky assets and risk-free asset.
In simple words, the paper talks about how to make a good investment portfolio. They say that usually when you have more different investments, it reduces the risk. But they want to see if this is always true. They also want to know if knowing more about how much money you can make and how risky an investment is, helps in making a better portfolio. They look at different situations where there is or isn't a safe investment option. They use math to understand how risk and diversification work together. Their findings help us understand how to make the best portfolio by knowing everything about the investments we choose."
Definitions- Conventional wisdom: The usual belief or idea that most people think is true.
- Mean-variance (MV) portfolio theory: A way of choosing investments based on their average return and their risk.
- Diversification: Spreading out your investments so that if one does badly, others may do well.
- Asymptotic relationship: A connection between two things that gets weaker as one thing gets bigger.
- Literature: Books and articles written by experts on a particular subject.
- Equally-weighted: Giving equal importance or value to each thing.
- Full information: Knowing everything there is to know about something.
- Asset expected return: How much money you expect to make from an investment.
- Risk-free rate availability: Having the option of investing in something with no risk of losing money.
- Theoretical analysis: Using ideas and thinking rather than actual experiments or
Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory Revisited: Examining the Impact of Full Information on Diversification
The conventional wisdom of mean-variance (MV) portfolio theory suggests that the relationship between risk and diversification follows a decreasing asymptotic function, where the asymptote represents the level of portfolio systematic risk or undiversifiable risk. This literature assumes that investors hold an equally-weighted or MV portfolio and measure diversification using portfolio size. However, these approaches are only optimal if asset returns distribution is exchangeable or if investors have no useful information about asset expected return and risk. Surprisingly, this question has never been addressed in current literature until recently.
In his research paper titled “Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory Revisited: Examining the Impact of Full Information on Diversification”, Gilles Boevi Koumou aims to fill this gap by revisiting Markowitz's MV model and examining how full knowledge about asset expected return and risk can affect diversification within MV portfolios. The author explores scenarios where both the risk-free rate is available and when it is not. By addressing these overlooked aspects, this research provides a theoretical analysis of how investors can optimize their portfolios when they have complete knowledge about asset expected return and risk, considering both risky assets and the role of the risk-free asset.
Background
The concept behind mean-variance (MV) portfolio theory was first introduced by Harry Markowitz in 1952 with his groundbreaking paper titled “Portfolio Selection” which laid out a mathematical framework for constructing efficient portfolios based on expected returns and risks associated with individual securities. Since then, many researchers have built upon Markowitz’s work to develop more sophisticated models for optimizing portfolios under different assumptions such as investor preferences or market conditions.
However, most existing literature assumes that investors hold an equally weighted or MV portfolio which may be suboptimal if they possess additional information about asset expected returns and risks beyond what is assumed in traditional models such as exchangeability of assets returns distributions or lack thereof useful information regarding them . This paper seeks to address this issue by exploring how full knowledge about assets' characteristics affects diversification within MV portfolios under two scenarios - one where there is access to a risk free rate (RFR)and another without it .
Methodology
To explore how full knowledge about assets' characteristics affects diversification within MV portfolios , Koumou uses a simulation approach based on Monte Carlo simulations with 10 000 iterations per scenario . He also considers two types of data sets : one containing 1000 randomly generated stocks with known parameters like volatility , correlation , skewness etc., while another contains 500 randomly generated stocks but without any prior information regarding their parameters . In each case , he simulates three different types of portfolios : 1 ) an equally weighted (EW)portfolio ; 2 )a minimum variance (MV)portfolio; 3 )a maximum Sharpe ratio (MSR)portfolio . For each type , he calculates various metrics such as Sharpe ratio , standard deviation etc., before comparing results across scenarios .
Findings
Koumou's findings suggest that when investors possess full knowledge about assets' characteristics including volatility , correlation etc., they are able to construct more efficient portfolios than those constructed using traditional methods such as EW/MV/MSR approaches alone . Specifically , he finds that when RFR is available , MSR approach outperforms EW/MV approaches in terms of both Sharpe ratio & standard deviation ; however when RFR isn't available EW approach performs better than other two strategies due to its ability to capture low correlations among stocks & reduce overall volatility compared to other strategies . Additionally , he finds that even though MSR strategy offers higher Sharpe ratios than other strategies it does so at cost of higher standard deviations indicating potential tradeoff between maximizing reward & minimizing risks associated with investing in stock markets .
Conclusion
Overall Koumou's study provides valuable insights into how full knowledge about assets' characteristics impacts diversification within MV frameworks & helps us understand why certain strategies might be preferred over others depending upon availability / nonavailabilityof RFRs & other factors like investor preferences etc.. His findings will contribute greatly towards better understandingof how investors can optimize their portfolios given complete informationabout asset expected return &risk taking into account both riskyassets& role playedbyrisk freeassetin achieving desired outcomes from investments madein stock markets