Sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide as inorganic carbon in the unsaturated zone under semi-arid forests
Authors: Israel Carmi, Joel Kronfeld, Murray Moinester
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Inorganic carbonates in semi-arid soils can act as a significant carbon sink
- Carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is absorbed by tree roots and hydrated by soil water, forming carbonic acid solutes
- Relict soil carbonate can dissolve, releasing calcium cations and additional bicarbonate
- Under specific conditions, these components combine to precipitate calcite while releasing CO2
- Previous claims suggested that such carbonates do not sequester substantial amounts of atmospheric CO2 due to their origin from pre-existing limestone and potential liberation of CO2 during calcite precipitation
- Field experiments conducted in Israel showed net sequestration of atmospheric CO2 under semi-arid forests through carbonate precipitation
- Most of the CO2 liberated during precipitation reactions may remain in the soil
- Ca+2 in sediment may come from sources other than pre-existing calcite
- Forestation can enhance pedogenic carbonate formation and have the potential to sequester 5-20% of the current annual anthropogenic increase in atmospheric CO2 as pedogenic carbonate.
Abstract: Inorganic carbon, in the form of allogenic (transported) and pedogenic (soil) carbonates in semi-arid soils, may comprise an important carbon sink. Carbon dioxide, CO2, originating from the atmosphere and exhaled by tree roots into the soil, may be hydrated by soil water within the unsaturated zone (USZ) of semi-arid soils to produce the carbonic acid (H2CO3) solutes HCO3- bicarbonate and H+ Hydrogen ion. This H+ may then dissolve relict soil CaCO3 carbonate (calcite), to release Ca+2 calcium cations and more HCO3- bicarbonate. When conditions allow, one mole of Ca+2 and two moles of HCO3- combine to precipitate one mole of calcite, and to release one mole of CO2: Ca+2 + 2HCO3- --> CaCO3 + CO2 + H2O. However, it has been claimed that such carbonates do not sequester significant amounts of present day atmospheric CO2. The reasons given were that they originate in part from the pre-existing limestone; and that for every mole of calcite precipitated, one mole of CO2 may be liberated to the atmosphere. It was argued that only if the Ca+2 cation is derived from a non-carbonate source can sequestration be assumed. We have tested these assumptions under field conditions at two semi-arid sites in Israel. We found that bicarbonate, originating from root exhalation, is depleted and is incorporated within the USZ as carbonates precipitate. Thus, a net sequestration of atmospheric CO2 does occur under semi-arid forests. Moreover, most of the CO2 liberated in the precipitation reaction may remain in the soil. And Ca+2 in the sediment may also be supplied from sources other than pre-existing calcite. Forestation can therefore augment pedogenic carbonate formation. By extrapolating our data globally, we suggest that worldwide semi-arid forests (existing and to be planted) may sequester 5-20% of the current annual anthropogenic increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide as pedogenic carbonate.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.