Deep uncertainties in sea-level rise and storm surge projections: Implications for coastal flood risk management

AI-generated keywords: Sea-level rise coastal communities flood risks decision-analytical model global sensitivity analysis

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Sea-level rise is a significant threat to coastal communities and infrastructure
  • Managing flood risks in these areas requires a complex combination of geophysical, economic, and infrastructure models
  • Balancing costs of upgrading infrastructure with potential damages from extreme flood events is challenging
  • Risk-based adaptation strategies often overlook uncertainties and trade-offs between competing objectives
  • Perry C. Oddo et al. enhanced a decision-analytical model to address trade-offs among conflicting stakeholder objectives
  • Traditional mean-centric decision theory may lead to myopic solutions in flood adaptation modeling
  • Multi-objective trade-offs expand the decision space and emphasize compromise solutions aligned with stakeholder preferences
  • Deep structural uncertainties, particularly related to storm surge parameters, have substantial effects on model outcomes
  • Global sensitivity analysis effectively identifies important parameter interactions critical for flood adaptation strategies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Perry C. Oddo, Ben Seiyon Lee, Gregory G. Garner, Vivek Srikrishnan, Patrick M. Reed, Chris E. Forest, Klaus Keller

Abstract: Sea-levels are rising in many areas around the world, posing risks to coastal communities and infrastructures. Strategies for managing these flood risks present decision challenges that require a combination of geophysical, economic, and infrastructure models. Previous studies have broken important new ground on the considerable tensions between the costs of upgrading infrastructure and the damages that could result from extreme flood events. However, many risk-based adaptation strategies remain silent on certain potentially important uncertainties, as well as the trade-offs between competing objectives. Here, we implement and improve on a classic decision-analytical model (van Dantzig 1956) to: (i) capture trade-offs across conflicting stakeholder objectives, (ii) demonstrate the consequences of structural uncertainties in the sea-level rise and storm surge models, and (iii) identify the parametric uncertainties that most strongly influence each objective using global sensitivity analysis. We find that the flood adaptation model produces potentially myopic solutions when formulated using traditional mean-centric decision theory. Moving from a single-objective problem formulation to one with multi-objective trade-offs dramatically expands the decision space, and highlights the need for compromise solutions to address stakeholder preferences. We find deep structural uncertainties that have large effects on the model outcome, with the storm surge parameters accounting for the greatest impacts. Global sensitivity analysis effectively identifies important parameter interactions that local methods overlook, and which could have critical implications for flood adaptation strategies.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 May. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1705.10585v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The global phenomenon of sea-level rise poses a significant threat to coastal communities and infrastructure. As such, effectively managing flood risks in these areas requires a complex combination of geophysical, economic, and infrastructure models. Previous studies have highlighted the challenges of balancing the costs of upgrading infrastructure with potential damages from extreme flood events. However, many risk-based adaptation strategies overlook crucial uncertainties and trade-offs between competing objectives. In a recent study by Perry C. Oddo, Ben Seiyon Lee, Gregory G. Garner, Vivek Srikrishnan, Patrick M. Reed, Chris E. Forest, and Klaus Keller a classic decision-analytical model was enhanced to address these issues. The researchers aimed to capture trade-offs among conflicting stakeholder objectives demonstrate the impacts of structural uncertainties in sea-level rise and storm surge models and identify key parametric uncertainties using global sensitivity analysis. The findings revealed that traditional mean-centric decision theory could lead to myopic solutions in flood adaptation modeling. Transitioning from a single-objective approach to one with multi-objective trade-offs significantly expanded the decision space and emphasized the need for compromise solutions aligned with stakeholder preferences. Moreover deep structural uncertainties were identified as having substantial effects on model outcomes with storm surge parameters playing a pivotal role. Global sensitivity analysis effectively pinpointed important parameter interactions that local methods might overlook but could have critical implications for flood adaptation strategies. Overall this study sheds light on the complexities involved in managing coastal flood risks amidst rising sea levels and underscores the importance of considering uncertainties and trade-offs in developing effective adaptation strategies for vulnerable coastal regions.
Created on 02 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.