Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1805.04508v1

In their paper titled "Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems," authors Svetlana Kiritchenko and Saif M. Mohammad discuss the inadvertent amplification and perpetuation of inappropriate human biases by automatic machine learning systems. Previous research on examining biases has primarily focused on individual systems, and there is a lack of benchmark datasets for evaluating such biases. To address this gap, the authors introduce the Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC), which comprises 8,640 carefully selected English sentences designed to uncover biases towards specific races and genders. The authors utilize the EEC to analyze 219 automatic sentiment analysis systems that participated in the SemEval-2018 Task 1 'Affect in Tweets' shared task. Their findings reveal that several of these systems exhibit statistically significant bias, consistently generating slightly higher sentiment intensity predictions for certain races or genders. The authors emphasize the importance of addressing these biases to ensure fair and unbiased outcomes. They make the EEC freely available to facilitate further research in this area, thus providing researchers with a benchmark dataset to assess and mitigate biased behavior in sentiment analysis systems. Overall, this study sheds light on the need for comprehensive evaluation of automatic machine learning systems regarding inappropriate biases.

• - Authors discuss the amplification and perpetuation of biases by machine learning systems
• - Previous research has focused on individual systems, lacking benchmark datasets
• - Introduce the Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC) to uncover biases towards races and genders
• - Analyze 219 sentiment analysis systems using EEC
• - Findings reveal statistically significant bias in some systems towards certain races or genders
• - Emphasize the importance of addressing biases for fair outcomes
• - Make EEC freely available for further research and mitigation of biased behavior
• - Study highlights the need for comprehensive evaluation of machine learning systems regarding biases.

Machine learning systems are programs that can learn and make decisions on their own. Biases are unfair preferences or prejudices towards certain groups of people. Amplification means making something stronger or bigger. Perpetuation means continuing or keeping something going. Previous research means studies that have been done before. Benchmark datasets are sets of information used to compare and measure the performance of different systems. Equity means fairness and treating everyone equally. Evaluation means examining and studying something to see how well it works. Corpus refers to a large collection of texts or data for analysis. Uncover means to find out or discover something hidden. Sentiment analysis systems are programs that analyze and understand emotions in text. Statistically significant means that the findings are important and not just due to chance. Mitigation means reducing or lessening something, like biases in this case."

Examining Gender and Race Bias in Automatic Machine Learning Systems

In their paper titled "Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems," authors Svetlana Kiritchenko and Saif M. Mohammad discuss the inadvertent amplification and perpetuation of inappropriate human biases by automatic machine learning systems. Previous research on examining biases has primarily focused on individual systems, leaving a gap in benchmark datasets for evaluating such biases. To address this gap, the authors introduce the Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC), which comprises 8,640 carefully selected English sentences designed to uncover biases towards specific races and genders.

The Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC)

The EEC is comprised of 8,640 carefully selected English sentences that are designed to uncover potential bias towards certain races or genders within sentiment analysis systems. The authors utilized the EEC to analyze 219 automatic sentiment analysis systems that participated in the SemEval-2018 Task 1 'Affect in Tweets' shared task. Their findings reveal that several of these systems exhibit statistically significant bias, consistently generating slightly higher sentiment intensity predictions for certain races or genders.

Implications of Biased Behavior

The authors emphasize the importance of addressing these biases to ensure fair and unbiased outcomes from machine learning models. They make the EEC freely available to facilitate further research in this area, thus providing researchers with a benchmark dataset to assess and mitigate biased behavior in sentiment analysis systems. Overall, this study sheds light on the need for comprehensive evaluation of automatic machine learning systems regarding inappropriate biases.

Conclusion

This paper provides insight into how gender and race bias can be inadvertently amplified by automatic machine learning models if not properly addressed through comprehensive evaluations using benchmark datasets like those provided by the Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC). By making their corpus freely available, Kiritchenko and Mohammad have made it easier for researchers to identify potential sources of bias within their own models so they can take steps toward mitigating them before deployment.