Forward asteroseismic modeling of stars with a convective core from gravity-mode oscillations: parameter estimation and stellar model selection
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- C. Aerts et al. propose a methodological framework for forward asteroseismic modeling of stars with a convective core using gravity-mode oscillations.
- The paper discusses major uncertainties in theoretically predicted gravity-mode oscillation frequencies based on linear pulsation theory.
- The authors provide a global methodological scheme to achieve forward asteroseismic modeling while properly taking into account correlations amongst free parameters included in stellar models.
- Major parameters to be estimated are the near-core rotation rate, amount of convective core overshooting, and level of chemical mixing in radiative zones.
- This modeling scheme allows for maximum likelihood estimation of stellar parameters for fixed input physics of equilibrium models followed by stellar model selection considering various choices of input physics.
- The approach uses Mahalanobis distance instead of often-used $\chi^2$ statistic and includes heteroscedasticity while providing an estimation of unknown variance in theoretically predicted oscillation frequencies.
Authors: C. Aerts, G. Molenberghs, M. Michielsen, M. G. Pedersen, R. Björklund, C. Johnston, J. S. G. Mombarg, D. M. Bowman, B. Buysschaert, P. I. Pápics, S. Sekaran, J. O. Sundqvist, A. Tkachenko, K. Truyaert, T. Van Reeth, E. Vermeyen
Abstract: We propose a methodological framework to perform forward asteroseismic modeling of stars with a convective core, based on gravity-mode oscillations. These probe the near-core region in the deep stellar interior. The modeling relies on a set of observed high-precision oscillation frequencies of low-degree coherent gravity modes with long lifetimes and their observational uncertainties. Identification of the mode degree and azimuthal order is assumed to be achieved from rotational splitting and/or from period spacing patterns. This paper has two major outcomes. The first is a comprehensive list and discussion of the major uncertainties of theoretically predicted gravity-mode oscillation frequencies based on linear pulsation theory, caused by fixing choices of the input physics for evolutionary models. Guided by a hierarchy among these uncertainties of theoretical frequencies, we subsequently provide a global methodological scheme to achieve forward asteroseismic modeling. We properly take into account correlations amongst the free parameters included in stellar models. Aside from the stellar mass, metalicity and age, the major parameters to be estimated are the near-core rotation rate, the amount of convective core overshooting, and the level of chemical mixing in the radiative zones. This modeling scheme allows for maximum likelihood estimation of the stellar parameters for fixed input physics of the equilibrium models, followed by stellar model selection considering various choices of the input physics. Our approach uses the Mahalanobis distance instead of the often used $\chi^2$ statistic and includes heteroscedasticity. It provides estimation of the unknown variance of the theoretically predicted oscillation frequencies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.