Automatic Airway Segmentation in chest CT using Convolutional Neural Networks
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study focuses on segmentation of airway tree from chest CT images
- Accurate airway segmentation crucial for assessing airway diseases like bronchiectasis and COPD
- Complex nature of airway structures makes precise segmentations challenging
- Researchers propose a simple yet robust approach using 3D Unet architecture
- Deep CNNs, specifically Unet architecture, proven effective for biomedical image segmentation
- Method trained on 12 CT scans and tested on 6 CT scans
- Impact of different loss functions and data augmentation techniques evaluated
- Average dice coefficient of 0.8 between ground-truth and automated segmentations reported
- Promising solution for accurate airway segmentation in chest CT images using deep learning techniques and adapted Unet architecture
- Contributes to advancing quantitative assessment methods for airway diseases with potential implications for diagnosis and treatment planning in clinical settings.
Authors: A. Garcia-Uceda Juarez, H. A. W. M. Tiddens, M. de Bruijne
Abstract: Segmentation of the airway tree from chest computed tomography (CT) images is critical for quantitative assessment of airway diseases including bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, obtaining an accurate segmentation of airways from CT scans is difficult due to the high complexity of airway structures. Recently, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become the state-of-the-art for many segmentation tasks, and in particular the so-called Unet architecture for biomedical images. However, its application to the segmentation of airways still remains a challenging task. This work presents a simple but robust approach based on a 3D Unet to perform segmentation of airways from chest CTs. The method is trained on a dataset composed of 12 CTs, and tested on another 6 CTs. We evaluate the influence of different loss functions and data augmentation techniques, and reach an average dice coefficient of 0.8 between the ground-truth and our automated segmentations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.