Towards Asynchronous Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: a joint training scheme using deep learning

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Brain-Computer Interface Motor Imagery Joint Training Scheme EEG

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors explore deep learning (DL) in joint training scheme for asynchronous motor imagery-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)
  • Proposed DL approach involves cascade of one-dimensional convolutional neural networks and fully-connected neural networks (CNN-FC)
  • Study focuses on three types of brain responses: non-imagery EEG, pure imagery EEG, and transitional imagery EEG
  • Pure and transitional imagery signals are treated as same class under joint training scheme
  • Performance evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation with mean accuracy reaching 71.52% for CNN-FC and 70.27% for CSP-SVM using sparse selection of electrode channels ($C_{z}$, $C_{3}$ and $C_{4}$)
  • Joint training scheme significantly enhances classification performance compared to approaches without it
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Patcharin Cheng, Phairot Autthasan, Boriwat Pijarana, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich, Theerawit Wilaiprasitporn

TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference

Abstract: In this paper, the deep learning (DL) approach is applied to a joint training scheme for asynchronous motor imagery-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). The proposed DL approach is a cascade of one-dimensional convolutional neural networks and fully-connected neural networks (CNN-FC). The focus is mainly on three types of brain responses: non-imagery EEG (\textit{background EEG}), (\textit{pure imagery}) EEG, and EEG during the transitional period between background EEG and pure imagery (\textit{transitional imagery}). The study of transitional imagery signals should provide greater insight into real-world scenarios. It may be inferred that pure imagery and transitional EEG are high and low power EEG imagery, respectively. Moreover, the results from the CNN-FC are compared to the conventional approach for motor imagery-BCI, namely the common spatial pattern (CSP) for feature extraction and support vector machine (SVM) for classification (CSP-SVM). Under a joint training scheme, pure and transitional imagery are treated as the same class, while background EEG is another class. Ten-fold cross-validation is used to evaluate whether the joint training scheme significantly improves the performance task of classifying pure and transitional imagery signals from background EEG. Using sparse of just a few electrode channels ($C_{z}$, $C_{3}$ and $C_{4}$), mean accuracy reaches 71.52 % and 70.27 % for CNN-FC and CSP-SVM, respectively. On the other hand, mean accuracy without the joint training scheme achieve only 62.68 % and 52.41 % for CNN-FC and CSP-SVM, respectively.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Aug. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1808.10852v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this paper, titled "Towards Asynchronous Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: a joint training scheme using deep learning," authors Patcharin Cheng, Phairot Autthasan, Boriwat Pijarana, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich, and Theerawit Wilaiprasitporn explore the application of deep learning (DL) in a joint training scheme for asynchronous motor imagery-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). The proposed DL approach involves a cascade of one-dimensional convolutional neural networks and fully-connected neural networks (CNN-FC). The study focuses on three types of brain responses: non-imagery EEG (background EEG), pure imagery EEG, and transitional imagery EEG during the period between background EEG and pure imagery. The research aims to provide greater insight into real-world scenarios by studying transitional imagery signals. It is suggested that pure imagery and transitional EEG represent high and low power EEG imagery, respectively. The results obtained from the CNN-FC model are compared to the conventional approach for motor imagery-BCI, which involves using common spatial pattern (CSP) for feature extraction and support vector machine (SVM) for classification (CSP-SVM). Under the joint training scheme proposed in this study, pure and transitional imagery signals are treated as the same class, while background EEG is considered another class. The performance of classifying pure and transitional imagery signals from background EEG is evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation. Remarkably, when utilizing only a sparse selection of electrode channels ($C_{z}$, $C_{3}$ and $C_{4}$), the mean accuracy achieved reaches 71.52% for CNN-FC and 70.27% for CSP-SVM. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that implementing the joint training scheme significantly enhances classification performance compared to approaches without it. Specifically, mean accuracy without the joint training scheme only reaches 62.68% for CNN-FC and 52.41% for CSP-SVM. This research contributes valuable insights into utilizing deep learning techniques in BCI systems for improved classification of motor imagery signals based on different brain responses.
Created on 05 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.