Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Recent progress in generative image modeling for complex datasets like ImageNet
- Authors train Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) at an unprecedented scale
- Investigation of instabilities associated with large-scale GAN training
- Truncating the latent space allows for fine control over sample fidelity and variety
- Development of BigGAN models, setting a new state-of-the-art in class-conditional image synthesis
- Impressive performance on ImageNet: Inception Score (IS) of 166.3 and Frechet Inception Distance (FID) of 9.6
- Significant improvements over previous best IS and FID scores
- Training GANs at larger scale with orthogonal regularization and truncation trick enables high-fidelity, diverse image generation from complex datasets like ImageNet
- Findings contribute to advancements in generative image modeling with implications for computer vision and artificial intelligence applications.
Authors: Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, Karen Simonyan
Abstract: Despite recent progress in generative image modeling, successfully generating high-resolution, diverse samples from complex datasets such as ImageNet remains an elusive goal. To this end, we train Generative Adversarial Networks at the largest scale yet attempted, and study the instabilities specific to such scale. We find that applying orthogonal regularization to the generator renders it amenable to a simple "truncation trick", allowing fine control over the trade-off between sample fidelity and variety by truncating the latent space. Our modifications lead to models which set the new state of the art in class-conditional image synthesis. When trained on ImageNet at 128x128 resolution, our models (BigGANs) achieve an Inception Score (IS) of 166.3 and Frechet Inception Distance (FID) of 9.6, improving over the previous best IS of 52.52 and FID of 18.65.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.