AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes

AI-generated keywords: Error Correction Codes Artificial Intelligence Reinforcement Learning Evolutionary Algorithms IEEE Transactions on Communications

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors propose an AI-driven approach to designing error correction codes (ECC)
  • Introduce a constructor-evaluator framework using AI algorithms
  • Goal is to continuously improve code construction process for maximum performance
  • Reinforcement learning and evolutionary algorithms used to construct linear block codes and polar codes
  • Results show comparable code performance to existing codes
  • Outperforms traditional constructions in cases where classic approaches fail
  • Advances the field of error correction coding by leveraging AI techniques
  • Findings accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Communications journal
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lingchen Huang, Huazi Zhang, Rong Li, Yiqun Ge, Jun Wang

14 pages; 15 figures; Accepted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate an artificial-intelligence (AI) driven approach to design error correction codes (ECC). Classic error correction code was designed upon coding theory that typically defines code properties (e.g., hamming distance, subchannel reliability, etc.) to reflect code performance. Its code design is to optimize code properties. However, an AI-driven approach doesn't necessarily rely on coding theory any longer. Specifically, we propose a constructor-evaluator framework, in which the code constructor is realized by AI algorithms and the code evaluator provides code performance metric measurements. The code constructor keeps improving the code construction to maximize code performance that is evaluated by the code evaluator. As examples, we construct linear block codes and polar codes with reinforcement learning (RL) and evolutionary algorithms. The results show that comparable code performance can be achieved with respect to the existing codes. It is noteworthy that our method can provide superior performances where existing classic constructions fail to achieve optimum for a specific decoder (e.g., list decoding for polar codes).

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jan. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1901.05719v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes," authors Lingchen Huang, Huazi Zhang, Rong Li, Yiqun Ge, and Jun Wang explore an innovative approach to designing error correction codes (ECC) using artificial intelligence (AI). Traditionally, error correction codes have been designed based on coding theory principles that define code properties such as hamming distance and subchannel reliability to optimize code performance. However, the authors propose a new AI-driven approach that no longer relies solely on coding theory. The authors introduce a constructor-evaluator framework in which the code constructor is implemented using AI algorithms and the code evaluator measures code performance metrics. The goal of this framework is to continuously improve the code construction process in order to maximize overall code performance. To demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, the authors apply reinforcement learning (RL) and evolutionary algorithms to construct linear block codes and polar codes. The results of their experiments show that comparable code performance can be achieved compared to existing codes. Moreover, the authors highlight that their method outperforms traditional constructions in cases where classic approaches fail to achieve optimum performance for specific decoders such as list decoding for polar codes. This research contributes to advancing the field of error correction coding by leveraging AI techniques to design more efficient ECCs. By moving away from traditional coding theory-based approaches, this AI-driven method opens up new possibilities for optimizing code properties and achieving superior performances in certain scenarios. The findings presented in this paper have been accepted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Communications journal.
Created on 17 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.