Defining what is Quantum: Not all what matters for physical phenomena is contained in space-time
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Antoine Suarez argues that the three main interpretations of quantum mechanics support the Principle Q (Quantum)
- Principle Q states that not all factors relevant to physical phenomena are contained within space-time
- Born's rule is underpinned by Principle Q
- Suarez suggests that Principle Q may be the best way to define quantum mechanics from more fundamental principles
- Quantum mechanics has unique features such as superposition and entanglement
- Different interpretations of quantum mechanics have attempted to make sense of these features, ultimately leading to the emergence of Principle Q
- While Principle Q has been supported by various interpretations of quantum mechanics, it remains controversial among physicists who adhere to a more traditional view of physics as being solely concerned with space-time phenomena
- Suarez argues that this view may be too narrow and limiting when it comes to understanding the true nature of reality
- Further research into exploring how Principle Q can provide a better understanding of physical phenomena beyond those limited by space-time constraints is suggested.
Authors: Antoine Suarez
Abstract: It is argued that the three main quantum interpretations, Copenhagen, de Broglie-Bohm, and Many-Worlds, support the Principle Q (Quantum): Not all what matters for physical phenomena is contained in space-time. This principle underpins Born's rule as well. So Principle Q may be the best way to defining Quantum "from more fundamental principles".
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.