Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search (Extended Version)

AI-generated keywords: Automated Machine Learning Mosaic Monte-Carlo Tree Search Optimization Algorithm Selection

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) involves selecting the most suitable algorithm and determining hyperparameter values for optimal performance on a dataset.
  • Mosaic is a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) based approach designed to address complex AutoML problems by combining structural and parametric optimization in an expensive black-box setting.
  • The study includes empirical investigations comparing optimization processes based on Bayesian optimization versus MCTS, exploring warm-start initialization techniques, and assessing the benefits of ensembling solutions gathered during the search process.
  • Mosaic outperformed Auto-Sklearn in tests on both OpenML 100 benchmark dataset and Scikit-learn portfolio, showing statistically significant improvements in AutoML tasks by leveraging innovative MCTS-based strategies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Marc Schoenauer, Michèle Sebag

Abstract: The AutoML task consists of selecting the proper algorithm in a machine learning portfolio, and its hyperparameter values, in order to deliver the best performance on the dataset at hand. Mosaic, a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) based approach, is presented to handle the AutoML hybrid structural and parametric expensive black-box optimization problem. Extensive empirical studies are conducted to independently assess and compare: i) the optimization processes based on Bayesian optimization or MCTS; ii) its warm-start initialization; iii) the ensembling of the solutions gathered along the search. Mosaic is assessed on the OpenML 100 benchmark and the Scikit-learn portfolio, with statistically significant gains over Auto-Sklearn, winner of former international AutoML challenges.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1906.00170v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), the task involves selecting the most suitable algorithm from a machine learning portfolio and determining its hyperparameter values to achieve optimal performance on a given dataset. In this extended version, authors Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Marc Schoenauer, and Michèle Sebag introduce Mosaic, a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) based approach designed to address the complex AutoML problem that combines structural and parametric optimization in an expensive black-box setting. The study includes extensive empirical investigations to independently evaluate and compare various aspects of the optimization process. This includes comparing the effectiveness of optimization processes based on Bayesian optimization versus MCTS, exploring the impact of warm-start initialization techniques, and assessing the benefits of ensembling solutions gathered throughout the search process. Mosaic is put to the test on both the OpenML 100 benchmark dataset and the Scikit-learn portfolio. The results reveal statistically significant improvements over Auto-Sklearn, which had previously emerged as a top performer in international AutoML challenges. The findings underscore Mosaic's prowess in delivering enhanced performance in AutoML tasks by leveraging innovative MCTS-based strategies for algorithm selection and hyperparameter tuning.
Created on 03 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.