How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?

AI-generated keywords: Multilingual BERT Cross-Lingual Transfer Probing Experiments Typologically Similar Languages Code-Switching

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Multilingual BERT (M-BERT) is a language model pre-trained in 104 languages
  • M-BERT performs well in zero-shot cross-lingual model transfer
  • Probing experiments reveal M-BERT's ability to transfer knowledge across languages with different scripts
  • Transfer works best between typologically similar languages
  • Monolingual corpora can train models for code-switching
  • M-BERT can identify translation pairs
  • Systematic deficiencies affect certain language pairs in M-BERT's multilingual representations
  • The study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of M-BERT's multilingual capabilities
  • The research highlights areas for further improvement in multilingual representation learning.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Telmo Pires, Eva Schlinger, Dan Garrette

Abstract: In this paper, we show that Multilingual BERT (M-BERT), released by Devlin et al. (2018) as a single language model pre-trained from monolingual corpora in 104 languages, is surprisingly good at zero-shot cross-lingual model transfer, in which task-specific annotations in one language are used to fine-tune the model for evaluation in another language. To understand why, we present a large number of probing experiments, showing that transfer is possible even to languages in different scripts, that transfer works best between typologically similar languages, that monolingual corpora can train models for code-switching, and that the model can find translation pairs. From these results, we can conclude that M-BERT does create multilingual representations, but that these representations exhibit systematic deficiencies affecting certain language pairs.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Jun. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1906.01502v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "How multilingual is Multilingual BERT? ", Telmo Pires, Eva Schlinger, and Dan Garrette explore the capabilities of Multilingual BERT (M-BERT), a language model pre-trained from monolingual corpora in 104 languages. They find that M-BERT performs remarkably well in zero-shot cross-lingual model transfer, where task-specific annotations in one language are used to fine-tune the model for evaluation in another language. To understand the reasons behind this success, the authors conduct numerous probing experiments. Their findings reveal that M-BERT can effectively transfer knowledge even to languages with different scripts. Additionally, they observe that transfer works best between typologically similar languages and demonstrate that monolingual corpora can train models for code-switching. Furthermore, M-BERT is capable of identifying translation pairs. Based on these results, the authors conclude that M-BERT indeed creates multilingual representations; however, they also identify systematic deficiencies that affect certain language pairs. This research sheds light on the strengths and limitations of M-BERT's multilingual capabilities and provides valuable insights into how it can be utilized for cross-lingual tasks. Overall, this study highlights areas for further improvement in multilingual representation learning.
Created on 20 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.