Emotionally-Aware Chatbots: A Survey
AI-generated Key Points
- Development of emotionally-aware chatbots (EAC) and lack of research in this area
- Most EACs use a neural-based approach and incorporate emotion classifiers
- Recent studies propose new datasets for building EAC in various languages
- Evaluation criteria for emotionally-aware chatbots include content, emotion, consistency, logic, naturalness, empathy/sympathy
- Evaluation criteria measured using scales ranging from 0 to 2 or through human judgment
- Some studies use t-tests or inter-annotator agreement measurements to assess system performance
- Previous studies on chatbot development do not focus on emotional aspect
- References to works providing history of chatbot technology development and classification based on goals and techniques
- Table 2 summarizes available datasets for emotionally-aware chatbots
- Table 3 summarizes available affective resources for emotion classification tasks
Authors: Endang Wahyu Pamungkas
Abstract: Textual conversational agent or chatbots' development gather tremendous traction from both academia and industries in recent years. Nowadays, chatbots are widely used as an agent to communicate with a human in some services such as booking assistant, customer service, and also a personal partner. The biggest challenge in building chatbot is to build a humanizing machine to improve user engagement. Some studies show that emotion is an important aspect to humanize machine, including chatbot. In this paper, we will provide a systematic review of approaches in building an emotionally-aware chatbot (EAC). As far as our knowledge, there is still no work focusing on this area. We propose three research question regarding EAC studies. We start with the history and evolution of EAC, then several approaches to build EAC by previous studies, and some available resources in building EAC. Based on our investigation, we found that in the early development, EAC exploits a simple rule-based approach while now most of EAC use neural-based approach. We also notice that most of EAC contain emotion classifier in their architecture, which utilize several available affective resources. We also predict that the development of EAC will continue to gain more and more attention from scholars, noted by some recent studies propose new datasets for building EAC in various languages.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.