Risk models for breast cancer and their validation

AI-generated keywords: Breast cancer risk IBIS model Calibration assessment Prevention trials Early detection

AI-generated Key Points

  • The article focuses on the development and evaluation of the IBIS (Tyrer-Cuzick) breast cancer risk model
  • The model combines various risk factors into a hybrid genetic segregation and regression model
  • It assesses an individual's risk of developing breast cancer at different follow-up times
  • The IBIS model is recommended by several organizations, including the American Cancer Society, to guide preventive and early detection strategies
  • It has been used to guide entry criteria into prevention trials and determine eligibility for supplemental breast magnetic resonance imaging
  • New graphical methods for assessing calibration over follow-up time are introduced
  • Different methods for assessing calibration of cumulative absolute risk are reviewed
  • Providing a detailed description of the method for expected risk is emphasized when presenting calibration findings
  • Opportunities for refinement and improvement of the current risk model exist
  • Other factors that affect breast cancer risk have difficulties being included in a relatively simple model
  • The research applies the breast cancer risk model and calibration assessment methods to data from a large cohort of women attending mammographic screening in Washington, USA
  • Overall, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to prevent cancer and diagnose it early when it is most treatable.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Adam R Brentnall, Jack Cuzick

Statist. Sci., Volume 35, Number 1 (2020), 14-30
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Strategies to prevent cancer and diagnose it early when it is most treatable are needed to reduce the public health burden from rising disease incidence. Risk assessment is playing an increasingly important role in targeting individuals in need of such interventions. For breast cancer many individual risk factors have been well understood for a long time, but the development of a fully comprehensive risk model has not been straightforward, in part because there have been limited data where joint effects of an extensive set of risk factors may be estimated with precision. In this article we first review the approach taken to develop the IBIS (Tyrer-Cuzick) model, and describe recent updates. We then review and develop methods to assess calibration of models such as this one, where the risk of disease allowing for competing mortality over a long follow-up time or lifetime is estimated. The breast cancer risk model model and calibration assessment methods are demonstrated using a cohort of 132 139 women attending mammography screening in Washington, USA.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Jul. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1907.02829v2

This article focuses on the development and evaluation of a breast cancer risk model known as the IBIS (Tyrer-Cuzick) model. The model combines various risk factors into a hybrid genetic segregation and regression model to assess an individual's risk of developing breast cancer at different follow-up times. The authors review the statistical foundations of the model and describe recent updates. The IBIS model has been used to guide entry criteria into prevention trials and is recommended by several organizations, including the American Cancer Society, to guide preventive and early detection strategies. It has also been used to determine eligibility for supplemental breast magnetic resonance imaging. The article introduces new graphical methods for assessing calibration over follow-up time which can be combined with Poisson regression analysis. The impact of using different methods to assess calibration of cumulative absolute risk is reviewed. The authors emphasize the importance of providing a detailed description of the method for expected risk when presenting calibration findings. While the current risk model is effective, there are opportunities for refinement and improvement. Other factors that affect breast cancer risk exist but have difficulties being included in a relatively simple model. The article concludes by applying the breast cancer risk model and calibration assessment methods to data from a large cohort of women attending mammographic screening in Washington, USA. Overall, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to prevent cancer and diagnose it early when it is most treatable. By accurately assessing an individual's breast cancer risk, targeted interventions can be implemented to reduce the public health burden associated with rising disease incidence.
Created on 23 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.