Auditable Credential Anonymity Revocation Based on Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Anonymity revocation is crucial in credential issuing systems to prevent misuse of credentials without consequences.
- Current approaches to anonymity revocation have limitations in terms of auditability.
- Rujia Li, David Galindo, and Qi Wang propose a novel approach based on privacy-preserving blockchain-based smart contracts for auditable credential anonymity revocation.
- The proposed solution ensures availability through code self-execution and provides auditability through public ledger immutability.
- The authors conducted evaluations in terms of running time, gas cost, and latency which showed that their scheme is feasible and efficient.
- By leveraging blockchain technology's inherent features such as transparency and immutability, the proposed approach ensures that the revocation process can be audited while maintaining user privacy.
- This paper presents a significant contribution to the field of credential issuing systems by addressing one of its critical challenges - anonymity revocation with auditability.
- The proposed solution has practical implications for various industries where credentials are issued and used regularly.
Authors: Rujia Li, David Galindo, Qi Wang
Abstract: Anonymity revocation is an essential component of credential issuing systems since unconditional anonymity is incompatible with pursuing and sanctioning credential misuse. However, current anonymity revocation approaches have shortcomings with respect to the auditability of the revocation process. In this paper, we propose a novel anonymity revocation approach based on privacy-preserving blockchain-based smart contracts, where the code self-execution property ensures availability and public ledger immutability provides auditability. We describe an instantiation of this approach, provide an implementation thereof and conduct a series of evaluations in terms of running time, gas cost and latency. The results show that our scheme is feasible and efficient.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.