A new take on the low-mass brown dwarf companions on wide-orbits in Upper-Scorpius
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The Upper-Scorpius association is a unique population of low-mass brown dwarfs
- Study aims to characterize the chemical and physical properties of three young, late-M brown-dwarfs claimed to be companions of the Upper Scorpius stars
- Spectra of six free floating analogues from the same association are analyzed for comparison
- Emission lines at UV and optical wavelengths are analyzed to investigate the presence of ongoing accretion processes
- X-Shooter spectrograph at VLT is used to obtain spectra over the 0.3–2.5 μm range simultaneously
- Forward modeling with ForMoSA code (Nested Sampling Bayesian inference method in using BT–SETTL15 models) is performed to infer Teff, log(g), and radius of objects
- Results are compatible with physical parameters found for free floating analogues of the association and with evolutionary model predictions
- Non-reproducibilities of BT–SETTL15 models for late M brown dwarfs limit accuracy on Teff estimates.
- Emission lines in several objects' spectra attributed to chromospheric activity except for USco1608–2315 which indicates active accretion.
- USco161031.9–16191305B is x4 over luminous; it could be explained by object activity if its companion is an unresolved multiple system.
- Study provides new insights into the physical and chemical properties of low mass brown dwarfs in the Upper Scorpius association and their potential mechanisms of formation.
Authors: Simon Petrus, Mickaël Bonnefoy, Gaël Chauvin, Carine Babusiaux, Philippe Delorme, Anne-Marie Lagrange, Nathan Florent, Amelia Bayo, Markus Janson, Beth Biller, Elena Manjavacas, Gabriel-Dominique Marleau, Taisiya G. Kopytova
Abstract: The Upper-Scorpius association (5-11 Myr) contains a unique population of low-mass (M<30 MJup) brown-dwarfs. The detailed relative characterization of their physical properties (mass, radius, temperature, composition, ongoing accretion) offers the opportunity to potentially explore their origin and their mechanisms of formation. We aim at characterizing the chemical and physical properties of three young, late-M brown-dwarfs claimed to be companions of the Upper-Scorpius stars USco161031.9-16191305, HIP77900, and HIP78530 using medium resolution spectroscopy at UV (R~3300), optical (R~5400), and near-infrared (R~4300) wavelengths. The spectra of six free-floating analogues from the same association are analyzed for comparison and to explore the potential physical differences between these substellar objects. We also aim at analyzing emission lines at UV and optical wavelengths to investigate the presence of ongoing accretion processes. The X-Shooter spectrograph at VLT was used to obtain the spectra of our targets over the 0.3-2.5 $\mu$m range simultaneously. Performing a forward modelling of the observed spectra with the ForMoSA code (Nested Sampling Bayesian inference method in using BT-SETTL15 models), we infer the Teff, log(g), and radius of our objects. Our results are compatible with physical parameters found for free floating analogues of the association and with evolutionary-model predictions. However the final accuracy on the Teff estimates is strongly limited by non-reproducibilities of the BT-SETTL15 models for late-M brown-dwarfs. We identified emission lines in the spectrum of several objects attributed to chromospheric activity except for USco1608-2315 for which they are indicative of active accretion. We confirm the x4 over-luminosity of USco161031.9-16191305B. It could be explained by the object activity and if the companion is an unresolved multiple system.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.