Measuring relative abundances in the solar corona with optimised linear combinations of spectral lines
AI-generated Key Points
- The study focuses on measuring FIP (first ionization potential) bias in the corona for understanding coronal and heliospheric physics.
- Elemental abundances in some coronal structures differ significantly from photospheric abundances, with a dependence on the FIP of the element.
- The authors aim to build a method for optimal determination of FIP biases in the corona from spectroscopic observations that is independent from Differential Emission Measure (DEM) inversions.
- They optimize linear combinations of spectroscopic lines of low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of their corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias with good accuracy for any DEM in a small set of typical DEMs.
- These optimized linear combinations allow retrieval of a test FIP bias map with good accuracy for all DEMs in the map.
- The results compare well with a FIP bias map obtained from observations using a DEM-dependent method.
- The study has several practical applications, including obtaining FIP bias maps from existing observations not specifically designed for this purpose, designing observations to obtain optimal FIP bias maps with given instruments, releasing constraints on spectroscopic line lists required to build FIP bias maps, and ultimately helping design solar or stellar UV spectrometers with FIP bias measurement capability.
- This method provides a convenient, fast, and accurate way to compute relative FIP bias maps that can be used to optimize existing observations and design new ones.
- The study's findings have implications for advancing our understanding of coronal and heliospheric physics as well as improving observational techniques in astronomy.
Authors: Natalia Zambrana Prado, Éric Buchlin
Abstract: Context. Elemental abundances in some coronal structures differ significantly from photospheric abundances, with a dependence on the first ionization potential (FIP) of the element. Measuring these FIP-dependent abundance biases is important for coronal and heliospheric physics. Aims. We aim to build a method for optimal determination of FIP biases in the corona from spectroscopic observations in a way that is in practice independent from Differential Emission Measure (DEM) inversions. Methods. We optimised linear combinations of spectroscopic lines of low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of the corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias with good accuracy for any DEM in a small set of typical DEMs. Results. These optimised linear combinations of lines allow retrieval of a test FIP bias map with good accuracy for all DEMs in the map. The results also compare well with a FIP bias map obtained from observations using a DEM-dependent method. Conclusions. The method provides a convenient, fast, and accurate way of computing relative FIP bias maps. It can be used to optimise the use of existing observations and the design of new observations and instruments.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 1
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.