Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.13142v2

Debris discs, which are second-generation dusty discs formed by collisions of planetesimals, have been extensively studied around hot and solar-type stars. However, the paucity of debris discs discovered around M-stars remains unclear. In this study, authors Patricia Luppe, Alexander V. Krivov, Mark Booth, and Jean-François Lestrade investigate whether the sensitivity and wavelength coverage of present-day telescopes are simply unfavorable for detecting these discs or if they are truly rare. The authors approach this question by examining the Herschel/DEBRIS survey that has searched for debris discs including M-type stars. Assuming that these cool-star discs are "similar" to those of hotter stars in some sense (i.e., in terms of dust location, temperature, fractional luminosity, or mass), they check whether this survey should have found them. Using their procedure, they can reproduce the $2.1^{+4.5}_{-1.7}$% detection rate of M-star debris discs of the DEBRIS survey which implies that these discs can indeed be similar to those around hotter stars but just avoid detection. The authors then apply this procedure to IRAM NIKA-2 and ALMA bands 3, 6 and 7 to predict possible detection rates and give recommendations for future observations. They do not favor observing with IRAM since it leads to lower detection rates than for the DEBRIS survey with only 0.6%-4.5% for a 15 min observation; ALMA observations also do not offer significant improvement with detection rates ranging from 0.9%-7.2%. Therefore more sensitive far infrared and single dish sub millimeter telescopes are necessary to discover the missing population of M star debris discs. Overall this study highlights the need for further investigation into why there is a lack of debris disc discoveries around M stars and suggests that current telescopes may not be sensitive enough to detect them. The authors' findings provide valuable insights for future observations and could potentially lead to the discovery of a new population of debris discs around M stars.

• - Debris discs are second-generation dusty discs formed by collisions of planetesimals
• - They have been extensively studied around hot and solar-type stars
• - The paucity of debris discs discovered around M-stars remains unclear
• - Authors investigate whether the sensitivity and wavelength coverage of present-day telescopes are simply unfavorable for detecting these discs or if they are truly rare
• - Using their procedure, authors can reproduce the $2.1^{+4.5}_{-1.7}$% detection rate of M-star debris discs of the DEBRIS survey which implies that these discs can indeed be similar to those around hotter stars but just avoid detection
• - Authors apply this procedure to IRAM NIKA-2 and ALMA bands 3, 6 and 7 to predict possible detection rates and give recommendations for future observations
• - More sensitive far infrared and single dish sub millimeter telescopes are necessary to discover the missing population of M star debris discs

Debris discs are like dusty rings that form around stars when things crash into each other. Scientists have looked at them a lot around hot and sunny stars, but not as much around cooler ones called M-stars. The scientists wanted to know if they just couldn't see the debris discs around M-stars because of their telescopes or if they really don't exist as much. They found a way to predict how often they should be able to see the debris discs and think they might be more common than they thought. But, they need better telescopes to be sure! Definitions- Debris discs: Rings of dust and rocks that form around stars from collisions - Planetesimals: Small objects in space that can come together to form planets - Telescopes: Tools used to look at things far away in space - Infrared: A type of light that we can't see with our eyes, but some telescopes can detect it - Sub millimeter: A type of light even smaller than infrared

Investigating the Paucity of Debris Discs Around M-Stars

In recent years, debris discs have been extensively studied around hot and solar-type stars. However, the paucity of debris discs discovered around M-stars remains unclear. In a new study published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, authors Patricia Luppe, Alexander V. Krivov, Mark Booth, and Jean-François Lestrade investigate whether current telescopes are simply unfavorable for detecting these discs or if they are truly rare.

What Are Debris Discs?

Debris discs are second-generation dusty discs formed by collisions of planetesimals that orbit stars at distances similar to those of our Solar System's Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. They can be detected through their thermal emission in the infrared (IR) and submillimeter (submm) wavelength ranges due to dust grains heated by starlight or interstellar radiation field.

The Herschel/DEBRIS Survey

The authors approach this question by examining the Herschel/DEBRIS survey which has searched for debris discs including M-type stars using data from the Herschel Space Observatory's Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS). Assuming that these cool-star discs are "similar" to those of hotter stars in some sense (i.e., in terms of dust location, temperature, fractional luminosity, or mass), they check whether this survey should have found them. Using their procedure they were able to reproduce the $2.1^{+4.5}_{-1.7}$% detection rate of M-star debris discs observed with DEBRIS which implies that these discs can indeed be similar to those around hotter stars but just avoid detection due to observational limitations such as sensitivity or wavelength coverage issues with current telescopes used for observations such as PACS on board Herschel Space Observatory .

Predictions For Future Observations With IRAM NIKA2 And ALMA Bands 3 6 & 7

The authors then apply their procedure to IRAM NIKA2 and ALMA bands 3 6 & 7 in order to predict possible detection rates and give recommendations for future observations regarding discovering more M star debris disks . They do not favor observing with IRAM since it leads to lower detection rates than for the DEBRIS survey with only 0.6%-4.5% for a 15 min observation; ALMA observations also do not offer significant improvement with detection rates ranging from 0