Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Vision

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Traditional Computer Vision Digital Image Processing Hybrid Methodologies Panoramic Vision

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Deep learning has revolutionized digital image processing but traditional computer vision techniques are still relevant
  • The paper analyzes the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches
  • Maintaining knowledge of classical computer vision is discussed
  • Hybrid methodologies combining deep learning and traditional computer vision have shown improved performance
  • Panoramic vision and 3D vision are highlighted as areas where combining the two approaches is popular
  • Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing debate between deep learning and traditional computer vision techniques in digital image processing
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Niall O' Mahony, Sean Campbell, Anderson Carvalho, Suman Harapanahalli, Gustavo Velasco-Hernandez, Lenka Krpalkova, Daniel Riordan, Joseph Walsh

in Advances in Computer Vision Proceedings of the 2019 Computer Vision Conference (CVC). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp. 128-144

Abstract: Deep Learning has pushed the limits of what was possible in the domain of Digital Image Processing. However, that is not to say that the traditional computer vision techniques which had been undergoing progressive development in years prior to the rise of DL have become obsolete. This paper will analyse the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. The aim of this paper is to promote a discussion on whether knowledge of classical computer vision techniques should be maintained. The paper will also explore how the two sides of computer vision can be combined. Several recent hybrid methodologies are reviewed which have demonstrated the ability to improve computer vision performance and to tackle problems not suited to Deep Learning. For example, combining traditional computer vision techniques with Deep Learning has been popular in emerging domains such as Panoramic Vision and 3D vision for which Deep Learning models have not yet been fully optimised

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Oct. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.13796v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This paper titled "Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Vision" by Niall O' Mahony, Sean Campbell, Anderson Carvalho, Suman Harapanahalli, Gustavo Velasco-Hernandez, Lenka Krpalkova, Daniel Riordan and Joseph Walsh explores the ongoing debate between deep learning and traditional computer vision techniques in the field of digital image processing. While deep learning has revolutionized the domain by pushing the limits of what was previously possible, this does not render traditional computer vision techniques obsolete. The authors aim to analyze both approaches' benefits and drawbacks while promoting a discussion on whether knowledge of classical computer vision should be maintained. The paper also delves into how these two sides of computer vision can be combined to enhance performance and tackle problems that are not well-suited for deep learning models. Several recent hybrid methodologies have been reviewed which have demonstrated improved computer vision performance. Emerging domains such as panoramic vision and 3D vision are highlighted where combining traditional computer vision techniques with deep learning has been particularly popular due to the fact that deep learning models have not yet been fully optimized for these areas. Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing debate between deep learning and traditional computer vision techniques in digital image processing. It explores both approaches' benefits and drawbacks while emphasizing the potential for combining them to achieve enhanced performance in various domains.
Created on 17 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.