Security Certification in Payment Card Industry: Testbeds, Measurements, and Recommendations
AI-generated Key Points
- The Payment Card Industry (PCI) involves various entities such as merchants, issuer banks, acquirer banks, and card brands.
- PCI Security Standards Council requires compliance with the PCI Data Security Standard (DSS) to ensure security for all entities that process payment card information.
- Researchers developed an e-commerce web application testbed called BuggyCart to evaluate the PCI DSS certification process for e-commerce websites.
- Six approved scanning vendors (ASV) were examined using the testbed and none of them were fully compliant with ASV scanning guidelines.
- A new lightweight scanning tool named PciCheckerLite was built and used to scan 1,203 e-commerce websites across various business sectors.
- 86% of the websites had at least one type of vulnerability that should have disqualified them as non-compliant according to PCI DSS standards.
- The study highlights a significant gap between the security standard and its real-world enforcement in terms of vulnerability screening capabilities of ASVs and rigor of certification processes.
- Similar research efforts could make a positive impact on the PCI community by producing high-quality open-sourced tools and customizing non-intrusive versions for testing production websites in the context of PCI DSS compliance.
- Proactive threat measurements using honeypots can assess attackers' behaviors or defenders' capabilities while physical card frauds occur due to stealing payment card information during physical transactions or cloning magnetic stripe cards while digital card frauds happen online due to flaws such as skipping SSL/TLS certificate validation or using insecure cryptographic primitives.
- The study's findings can help improve the enforcement of PCI DSS in practice and enhance the security of payment card information processing.
Authors: Sazzadur Rahaman (Daphne), Gang Wang (Daphne), Danfeng (Daphne), Yao
Abstract: The massive payment card industry (PCI) involves various entities such as merchants, issuer banks, acquirer banks, and card brands. Ensuring security for all entities that process payment card information is a challenging task. The PCI Security Standards Council requires all entities to be compliant with the PCI Data Security Standard (DSS), which specifies a series of security requirements. However, little is known regarding how well PCI DSS is enforced in practice. In this paper, we take a measurement approach to systematically evaluate the PCI DSS certification process for e-commerce websites. We develop an e-commerce web application testbed, BuggyCart, which can flexibly add or remove 35 PCI DSS related vulnerabilities. Then we use the testbed to examine the capability and limitations of PCI scanners and the rigor of the certification process. We find that there is an alarming gap between the security standard and its real-world enforcement. None of the 6 PCI scanners we tested are fully compliant with the PCI scanning guidelines, issuing certificates to merchants that still have major vulnerabilities. To further examine the compliance status of real-world e-commerce websites, we build a new lightweight scanning tool named PciCheckerLite and scan 1,203 e-commerce websites across various business sectors. The results confirm that 86% of the websites have at least one PCI DSS violation that should have disqualified them as non-compliant. Our in-depth accuracy analysis also shows that PciCheckerLite's output is more precise than w3af. We reached out to the PCI Security Council to share our research results to improve the enforcement in practice.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.