Enforced freedom: electric-field-induced declustering of ionic-liquid ions in the double layer
Authors: Yufan Zhang, Ting Ye, Ming Chen, Zachary Goodwin, Jun Huang, Guang Feng, Alexei Kornyshev
Abstract: Whereas the majority of ions in the bulk of a solvent-free ionic liquid is bound into clusters, this is expected to change in the electrical double layer (EDL), in which the resulting electric field 'prefers' to interact with electrical monopoles-free, unclustered ions. The competition between the propensity of ions to stay in a clustered state and the reduction of the energy of ions in electric field in the free state determines the resulting portion of free ions in the EDL. We present a study of this effect, based on the simplest possible mean-field theory. 'Cracking' of ion clusters into individual ions in electric field is accompanied by the change of the dielectric response of ionic liquid which is different in clustered and unclustered states. The predictions of the theory are verified and further explored by specially performed molecular dynamics simulations. A particular finding of the theory is that the differential capacitance vs potential curve displays a bell shape despite low concentration of free charge carriers, because the dielectric response of bound ions reduces the threshold concentration of the bell- to camel-shape transition. Whereas qualitatively these findings make perfect sense, in reality the exact numbers and criteria might be different as the presented simple theory does not take into account overscreening and oscillating charge and electrostatic potential distributions near the electrode. This is why testing the theory with computer simulations is essential, but the latter basically reproduce the qualitative conclusions of the theory.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.