Towards Memory Safe Python Enclave for Security Sensitive Computation
Authors: Huibo Wang (Baidu Security, USA), Mingshen Sun (Baidu Security, USA), Qian Feng (Baidu Security, USA), Pei Wang (Baidu Security, USA), Tongxin Li (Baidu Security, USA), Yu Ding (Baidu Security, USA)
Abstract: Intel SGX Guard eXtensions (SGX), a hardware-supported trusted execution environment (TEE), is designed to protect security-sensitive applications. However, since enclave applications are developed with memory unsafe languages such as C/C++, traditional memory corruption is not eliminated in SGX. Rust-SGX is the first toolkit providing enclave developers with a memory-language. However, Rust is considered a Systems language and has become the right choice for concurrent applications and web browsers. Many application domains such as Big Data, Machine Learning, Robotics, Computer Vision are more commonly developed in the python programming language. Therefore, Python application developers cannot benefit from secure enclaves like Intel SGX and rust-SGX. To fill this gap, we propose Python-SGX, which is a memory-safe SGX SDK providing enclave developers a memory-safe Python development environment. The key idea is to enable memory-safe Python language in SGX by solving the following key challenges: (1) defining a memory-safe Python interpreter (2)replacing unsafe elements of Python interpreter with safe ones,(3) achieving comparable performance to non-enclave Python applications, and (4) not introducing any unsafe new code or libraries into SGX. We propose to build Python-SGX with PyPy, a Python interpreter written by RPython, which is a subset of Python, and tame unsafe parts in PyPy by formal verification, security hardening, and memory safe language. We have implemented python-SGX and tested it with a series of benchmarks programs. Our evaluation results show that Python-SGX does not cause significant overhead.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.