Mathematical models for pain: a systematic review

AI-generated keywords: Mathematical models Pain Etiology Diagnostics Treatment

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Lack of prevailing theory explaining origin, qualities, and alleviation of pain
  • Limited use of mathematical or computational techniques in studying pain etiology and mechanisms
  • Comprehensive analysis of existing mathematical and computational approaches for characterizing pain
  • Identified 31 relevant articles out of 560 searched
  • Predominant use of classification algorithms to categorize pain and no-pain conditions
  • Emphasis on identifying presence or absence of pain rather than exploring specific features for diagnostics and treatment
  • Mathematical models hold potential in augmenting understanding of pain mechanisms
  • Incorporating mathematical and computational techniques can uncover new insights into pain management
  • Need for further exploration and development of mathematical models in pain research
  • Potential contribution to diagnostic methods and treatment strategies for various types of pain
  • Further investigation necessary to identify novel pathways for mathematics' role in managing chronic or acute pains.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Victoria Ashley Lang, Torbjörn Lundh, Max Ortiz-Catalan

arXiv: 2006.01745v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
15 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: There is no single prevailing theory of pain that explains its origin, qualities, and alleviation. Although many studies have investigated various molecular targets for pain management, few have attempted to examine the etiology or working mechanisms of pain through mathematical or computational techniques. In this systematic review, we identified mathematical and computational approaches for characterizing pain. The databases queried were Science Direct and PubMed, yielding 560 articles published prior to January 1st, 2020. After screening for inclusion of mathematical or computational models of pain, 31 articles were deemed relevant. Most of the reviewed articles utilized classification algorithms to categorize pain and no-pain conditions. We found the literature heavily focused on the application of existing models or machine learning algorithms to identify the presence or absence of pain, rather than to explore features of pain that may be used for diagnostics and treatment. Although understudied, the development of mathematical models may augment the current understanding of pain by providing directions for testable hypotheses of its underlying mechanisms.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jun. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2006.01745v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their systematic review titled "Mathematical models for pain," Victoria Ashley Lang, Torbjörn Lundh, and Max Ortiz-Catalan explore the lack of a prevailing theory that fully explains the origin, qualities, and alleviation of pain. While numerous studies have focused on molecular targets for pain management, there has been a limited attempt to investigate the etiology and working mechanisms of pain using mathematical or computational techniques. To address this gap in research, the authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing mathematical and computational approaches for characterizing pain. They searched databases such as Science Direct and PubMed and identified 560 articles published before January 1st, 2020. After screening these articles for inclusion of mathematical or computational models of pain, they deemed 31 articles relevant for their review. The reviewed articles predominantly employed classification algorithms to categorize pain and no-pain conditions. However, the authors observed that the literature heavily emphasized the application of existing models or machine learning algorithms to identify the presence or absence of pain rather than exploring specific features of pain that could be utilized for diagnostics and treatment. Despite being an understudied area, Lang et al. argue that the development of mathematical models holds great potential in augmenting our current understanding of pain by providing directions for testable hypotheses regarding its underlying mechanisms. By incorporating mathematical and computational techniques into pain research, researchers can potentially uncover new insights into how pain arises and how it can be effectively managed. Overall, this systematic review highlights the need for further exploration and development of mathematical models in order to advance our understanding of pain beyond traditional approaches. The authors emphasize that such models have the potential to contribute significantly to diagnostic methods and treatment strategies related to various types of pain. They suggest that further investigation is necessary in order to identify novel pathways through which mathematics can inform our knowledge about how best to manage different forms of chronic or acute pains.
Created on 29 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.