Normalizing Flows Across Dimensions
Authors: Edmond Cunningham, Renos Zabounidis, Abhinav Agrawal, Madalina Fiterau, Daniel Sheldon
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors address the challenge of leveraging the underlying structure of real-world data to improve generative algorithms
- Focus on facial images as an example of data hypothesized to lie on a low-dimensional manifold
- Normalizing flows have limitations in learning lower-dimensional representations due to successive variable transformations
- Noisy injective flows (NIF) introduced as a generalization of normalizing flows to effectively operate across dimensions
- NIF explicitly maps latent space to a learnable manifold within high-dimensional data space using injective transformations
- Additive noise model incorporated into NIF to accommodate deviations from the manifold and establish a stochastic inverse of the generative process
- Implementation of NIF within existing flow architectures leads to significant improvements in sample quality and facilitates generation of separable data embeddings
Abstract: Real-world data with underlying structure, such as pictures of faces, are hypothesized to lie on a low-dimensional manifold. This manifold hypothesis has motivated state-of-the-art generative algorithms that learn low-dimensional data representations. Unfortunately, a popular generative model, normalizing flows, cannot take advantage of this. Normalizing flows are based on successive variable transformations that are, by design, incapable of learning lower-dimensional representations. In this paper we introduce noisy injective flows (NIF), a generalization of normalizing flows that can go across dimensions. NIF explicitly map the latent space to a learnable manifold in a high-dimensional data space using injective transformations. We further employ an additive noise model to account for deviations from the manifold and identify a stochastic inverse of the generative process. Empirically, we demonstrate that a simple application of our method to existing flow architectures can significantly improve sample quality and yield separable data embeddings.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.