Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.00293v3

Micro-Frontends are becoming increasingly popular among large companies such as DAZN, Ikea, and Starbucks. They enable the splitting of monolithic frontends into smaller independent micro applications. However, many companies are hesitant to adopt Micro-Frontends due to a lack of knowledge about their benefits and the perplexed and contradictory online documentation provided. The objective of this study was to map existing knowledge on Micro-Frontends by understanding the motivations of companies when adopting them, as well as their possible benefits and issues. The study conducted a Multivocal Literature Review analyzing 43 sources and classifying motivations, benefits, and issues. The results showed that existing architectural options for building web applications become cumbersome when the application and development team grows or if multiple teams need to develop the same frontend application. The application of Micro-Frontend confirmed expected benefits such as scaling processes according to business needs in the same way microservices do with backend side development. Micro-Frontends also provide cross-functional development teams that can scale processes when needed. However, Micro-Frontends also showed some issues such as increased payload size of the application, increased code duplication and coupling between teams, and monitoring complexity. Despite these challenges, Micro-Frontends allow companies to scale development according to business needs in the same way microservices do with backend side development. The study found that only 3 out of 43 sources were peer-reviewed academic papers while the other 40 were sourced from grey literature (e.g., articles, blog posts, videos, books, podcasts). The number of publications on Micro-Frontends has been constantly growing since 2015. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the motivations for adopting Micro-Frontends along with their potential benefits and issues. While there are some challenges associated with implementing them successfully in an organization's tech stack architecture; they offer significant advantages over traditional approaches for building web applications.

• - Micro-Frontends are gaining popularity among large companies such as DAZN, Ikea, and Starbucks.
• - They allow for the splitting of monolithic frontends into smaller independent micro applications.
• - Many companies are hesitant to adopt Micro-Frontends due to a lack of knowledge about their benefits and the perplexed and contradictory online documentation provided.
• - The objective of the study was to map existing knowledge on Micro-Frontends by understanding the motivations of companies when adopting them, as well as their possible benefits and issues.
• - The study analyzed 43 sources and classified motivations, benefits, and issues through a Multivocal Literature Review.
• - Existing architectural options for building web applications become cumbersome when the application and development team grows or if multiple teams need to develop the same frontend application.
• - The application of Micro-Frontend confirmed expected benefits such as scaling processes according to business needs in the same way microservices do with backend side development.
• - Micro-Frontends also provide cross-functional development teams that can scale processes when needed.
• - However, Micro-Frontends also showed some issues such as increased payload size of the application, increased code duplication and coupling between teams, and monitoring complexity.
• - Only 3 out of 43 sources were peer-reviewed academic papers while the other 40 were sourced from grey literature (e.g., articles, blog posts, videos, books, podcasts).
• - The number of publications on Micro-Frontends has been constantly growing since 2015.
• - Despite challenges associated with implementing them successfully in an organization's tech stack architecture; they offer significant advantages over traditional approaches for building web applications.

Micro-Frontends are a new way of building websites that big companies like DAZN, Ikea, and Starbucks are starting to use. They break up the website into smaller parts that work independently. Some companies don't know much about Micro-Frontends and are unsure if they should use them. A study looked at why companies might want to use Micro-Frontends and what problems they might have. The study found that Micro-Frontends can help teams work better together but can also make the website slower and harder to manage. Definitions- Micro-Frontends: a way of building websites by breaking them up into smaller independent parts - Monolithic frontends: a traditional way of building websites where everything is built as one big piece - Architecture: the way something is designed or put together - Payload size: how much data needs to be sent over the internet for a website to load - Code duplication: when the same code is used in multiple places, which can make it harder to change later on - Coupling between teams: when different teams need to work together closely, which can be difficult if they have different ways of doing things - Monitoring complexity: how hard it is to keep track of what's happening on a website

Micro-Frontends: An Overview of Benefits, Issues, and Motivations

Micro-Frontends are becoming increasingly popular among large companies such as DAZN, Ikea, and Starbucks. They enable the splitting of monolithic frontends into smaller independent micro applications. However, many companies are hesitant to adopt Micro-Frontends due to a lack of knowledge about their benefits and the perplexed and contradictory online documentation provided. The objective of this study was to map existing knowledge on Micro-Frontends by understanding the motivations of companies when adopting them, as well as their possible benefits and issues.

What Are Micro-Frontends?

Micro-frontend is an architectural approach that enables developers to split a single web application into multiple small applications or components that can be independently developed by different teams. This approach allows for better scalability in terms of development processes since each team can focus on its own part without having to worry about other parts being affected by changes made in one area. It also helps with code reuse since components can be shared across multiple projects instead of having to write new code every time a similar feature is needed in another project.

The Study

The study conducted a Multivocal Literature Review analyzing 43 sources and classifying motivations, benefits, and issues associated with Micro-Frontend adoption. The results showed that existing architectural options for building web applications become cumbersome when the application and development team grows or if multiple teams need to develop the same frontend application. The application of Micro-Frontend confirmed expected benefits such as scaling processes according to business needs in the same way microservices do with backend side development. Micro-Frontends also provide cross-functional development teams that can scale processes when needed.

Benefits & Issues

However, there were some issues identified such as increased payload size of the application due to loading all components at once; increased code duplication due to sharing components between different teams; coupling between teams which could lead to conflicts over coding standards; and monitoring complexity due to tracking errors from multiple sources rather than just one source (the monolith). Despite these challenges though, it was found that overall there are significant advantages associated with using Micro Front Ends over traditional approaches for building web applications including improved scalability both in terms of development process speed/efficiency as well as user experience performance; better separation between concerns allowing for easier maintenance; improved collaboration opportunities amongst cross functional teams; faster deployment cycles leading towards more frequent releases; better security practices through isolation techniques like sandboxing etc.; improved test coverage through automated testing tools like Selenium etc.; reduced costs associated with hiring specialized developers for specific areas etc..

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the motivations for adopting Micro-Frontends along with their potential benefits and issues. While there are some challenges associated with implementing them successfully in an organization's tech stack architecture; they offer significant advantages over traditional approaches for building web applications which should not be overlooked when considering how best structure your company’s technology stack architecture going forward into 2021!