Reinforcement Learning and its Connections with Neuroscience and Psychology

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Reinforcement learning (RL) methods have achieved success in complex sequential tasks such as playing Atari games, Go, and Poker.
  • RL algorithms have surpassed human performance by learning from scratch and relying solely on scalar rewards obtained through interaction with the environment.
  • Fundamental concepts in RL draw inspiration from animal learning, psychology, and neuroscience.
  • The paper conducts an extensive review of findings in neuroscience and psychology to establish a comprehensive understanding of RL's potential for modeling learning and decision-making in the brain.
  • Mapping modern RL algorithms to specific discoveries in neurophysiological and behavioral literature highlights the relationship between RL, neuroscience, and psychology.
  • This mapping provides insights into how RL aligns with biological processes underlying learning and decision-making.
  • The observed connection between RL, neuroscience, and psychology has implications for advancing research in both artificial intelligence (AI) and brain science.
  • Bridging these disciplines allows researchers to enhance our understanding of how RL algorithms function within biological systems.
  • The integration of insights from neuroscience and psychology enhances our understanding of RL and opens up new avenues for interdisciplinary research at the intersection of AI and brain science.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ajay Subramanian, Sharad Chitlangia, Veeky Baths

Accepted to Elsevier Neural Networks; 19 pages, 6 figures, 1 table

Abstract: Reinforcement learning methods have recently been very successful at performing complex sequential tasks like playing Atari games, Go and Poker. These algorithms have outperformed humans in several tasks by learning from scratch, using only scalar rewards obtained through interaction with their environment. While there certainly has been considerable independent innovation to produce such results, many core ideas in reinforcement learning are inspired by phenomena in animal learning, psychology and neuroscience. In this paper, we comprehensively review a large number of findings in both neuroscience and psychology that evidence reinforcement learning as a promising candidate for modeling learning and decision making in the brain. In doing so, we construct a mapping between various classes of modern RL algorithms and specific findings in both neurophysiological and behavioral literature. We then discuss the implications of this observed relationship between RL, neuroscience and psychology and its role in advancing research in both AI and brain science.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jun. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.01099v5

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Reinforcement Learning and its Connections with Neuroscience and Psychology," authors Ajay Subramanian, Sharad Chitlangia, and Veeky Baths explore the success of reinforcement learning (RL) methods in complex sequential tasks such as playing Atari games, Go, and Poker. These algorithms have surpassed human performance by learning from scratch and relying solely on scalar rewards obtained through interaction with their environment. While there has been significant independent innovation in RL, many fundamental concepts in this field draw inspiration from animal learning, psychology, and neuroscience. To establish a comprehensive understanding of RL's potential for modeling learning and decision-making in the brain, the authors conduct an extensive review of findings in both neuroscience and psychology. By mapping various classes of modern RL algorithms to specific discoveries in neurophysiological and behavioral literature, the authors highlight the relationship between RL, neuroscience, and psychology. This mapping provides valuable insights into how RL aligns with biological processes underlying learning and decision-making. The paper also discusses the implications of this observed connection between RL, neuroscience, and psychology for advancing research in both artificial intelligence (AI) and brain science. By bridging these disciplines, researchers can leverage knowledge from each field to enhance our understanding of RL algorithms' functioning within biological systems. Overall, this paper contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting reinforcement learning as a promising approach for modeling cognitive processes in the brain. The integration of insights from neuroscience and psychology not only enhances our understanding of RL but also opens up new avenues for interdisciplinary research at the intersection of AI and brain science.
Created on 19 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.