Approximate Bayesian Computations to fit and compare insurance loss models

AI-generated keywords: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC)

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) is a statistical learning technique for model calibration and selection
  • ABC compares observed data to simulated data
  • Unlike traditional methods, ABC only requires the ability to generate synthetic data from models
  • The study applies ABC to fit and compare insurance loss models using aggregated data
  • The authors propose a state-of-the-art implementation of ABC in Python using sequential Monte Carlo sampling
  • The Wasserstein distance is used to compare observed and synthetic data
  • ABC allows for effective model calibration without explicit likelihood calculations
  • Advantages of ABC include flexibility in model selection and robustness against misspecification
  • The study provides a comprehensive framework for fitting and comparing insurance loss models using ABC
  • The proposed Python implementation offers a practical tool for researchers
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pierre-Olivier Goffard, Patrick J. Laub

Abstract: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) is a statistical learning technique to calibrate and select models by comparing observed data to simulated data. This technique bypasses the use of the likelihood and requires only the ability to generate synthetic data from the models of interest. We apply ABC to fit and compare insurance loss models using aggregated data. A state-of-the-art ABC implementation in Python is proposed. It uses sequential Monte Carlo to sample from the posterior distribution and the Wasserstein distance to compare the observed and synthetic data.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.03833v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) is a powerful statistical learning technique that allows for the calibration and selection of models by comparing observed data to simulated data. Unlike traditional methods that rely on likelihood estimation, ABC only requires the ability to generate synthetic data from the models of interest. In this study, conducted by Pierre-Olivier Goffard and Patrick J. Laub, ABC is applied to fit and compare insurance loss models using aggregated data. The authors propose a state-of-the-art implementation of ABC in Python, which utilizes sequential Monte Carlo sampling to draw samples from the posterior distribution. To compare the observed and synthetic data, they employ the Wasserstein distance, a metric commonly used in probability theory and statistics. By leveraging ABC, the researchers are able to effectively calibrate insurance loss models without relying on explicit likelihood calculations. This approach offers several advantages, including flexibility in model selection and robustness against misspecification. Overall, this study presents a comprehensive framework for fitting and comparing insurance loss models using ABC. The proposed Python implementation provides researchers with a practical tool for implementing this technique in their own work. By bypassing the need for likelihood estimation, ABC offers an innovative approach to model calibration that can enhance our understanding of complex systems such as insurance losses.
Created on 03 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.