StyPath: Style-Transfer Data Augmentation For Robust Histology Image Classification

AI-generated keywords: Kidney transplant pathology

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) classification is a significant challenge in kidney transplant pathology
  • Low inter-observer agreement and poor reproducibility in histological tissue stain analysis contribute to the challenge
  • Variability in tissue stain quality among labs and fading archival sections hinder accurate morphological feature description by pathologists
  • A novel pipeline proposes using StyPath, a histological data augmentation technique, to develop robust deep neural networks for AMR classification
  • StyPath outperforms other popular histological data augmentation techniques, generating images efficiently and reducing error rates from 14.8% to 11.5%
  • The model's performance was evaluated using Bayesian performance estimates and Grad-CAM representations, showing improved histological classification performance and generalization ability
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pietro Antonio Cicalese, Aryan Mobiny, Pengyu Yuan, Jan Becker, Chandra Mohan, Hien Van Nguyen

Abstract: The classification of Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant remains challenging even for experienced nephropathologists; this is partly because histological tissue stain analysis is often characterized by low inter-observer agreement and poor reproducibility. One of the implicated causes for inter-observer disagreement is the variability of tissue stain quality between (and within) pathology labs, coupled with the gradual fading of archival sections. Variations in stain colors and intensities can make tissue evaluation difficult for pathologists, ultimately affecting their ability to describe relevant morphological features. Being able to accurately predict the AMR status based on kidney histology images is crucial for improving patient treatment and care. We propose a novel pipeline to build robust deep neural networks for AMR classification based on StyPath, a histological data augmentation technique that leverages a light weight style-transfer algorithm as a means to reduce sample-specific bias. Each image was generated in 1.84 +- 0.03 seconds using a single GTX TITAN V gpu and pytorch, making it faster than other popular histological data augmentation techniques. We evaluated our model using a Monte Carlo (MC) estimate of Bayesian performance and generate an epistemic measure of uncertainty to compare both the baseline and StyPath augmented models. We also generated Grad-CAM representations of the results which were assessed by an experienced nephropathologist; we used this qualitative analysis to elucidate on the assumptions being made by each model. Our results imply that our style-transfer augmentation technique improves histological classification performance (reducing error from 14.8% to 11.5%) and generalization ability.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.05008v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of kidney transplant pathology, the classification of Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) poses a significant challenge for even experienced nephropathologists. This is due to low inter-observer agreement and poor reproducibility in histological tissue stain analysis. The variability in tissue stain quality among pathology labs, as well as the gradual fading of archival sections, contribute to this difficulty. These variations in stain colors and intensities hinder pathologists' ability to accurately describe relevant morphological features, impacting patient treatment and care. To address these challenges, a novel pipeline has been proposed to develop robust deep neural networks for AMR classification using StyPath, a histological data augmentation technique that utilizes a lightweight style-transfer algorithm to reduce sample-specific bias. This approach has shown promising results, with each image being generated efficiently in 1.84 +- 0.03 seconds using a single GTX TITAN V GPU and PyTorch, outperforming other popular histological data augmentation techniques. The model's performance was evaluated using a Monte Carlo estimate of Bayesian performance, generating an epistemic measure of uncertainty to compare both the baseline and StyPath augmented models. Additionally, Grad-CAM representations of the results were assessed by an experienced nephropathologist through qualitative analysis to elucidate on the assumptions made by each model. The findings suggest that the style-transfer augmentation technique significantly improves histological classification performance by reducing error rates from 14.8% to 11.5% while enhancing generalization ability. This advancement holds promise for improving AMR classification accuracy based on kidney histology images, ultimately benefiting patient outcomes and advancing the field of transplant pathology research.
Created on 01 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.