Investigation of Sentiment Controllable Chatbot

AI-generated keywords: Sentiment Controllable Chatbot Seq2Seq Model Persona-based Model Reinforcement Learning CycleGAN

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the limitations of conventional seq2seq chatbot models
  • Four different models are investigated: persona-based model, reinforcement learning, plug and play model, and CycleGAN
  • These models aim to scale or adjust the sentiment of chatbot responses
  • Machine-evaluated metrics are introduced to assess the reasonableness of chatbot responses
  • Reinforcement learning and CycleGAN show promise in controlling sentiment in chatbot responses
  • Potential for improving chatbot interactions by incorporating sentiment considerations
  • Research contributes to advancing sentiment controllability in chatbots through different models and novel metrics
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hung-yi Lee, Cheng-Hao Ho, Chien-Fu Lin, Chiung-Chih Chang, Chih-Wei Lee, Yau-Shian Wang, Tsung-Yuan Hsu, Kuan-Yu Chen

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1804.02504

Abstract: Conventional seq2seq chatbot models attempt only to find sentences with the highest probabilities conditioned on the input sequences, without considering the sentiment of the output sentences. In this paper, we investigate four models to scale or adjust the sentiment of the chatbot response: a persona-based model, reinforcement learning, a plug and play model, and CycleGAN, all based on the seq2seq model. We also develop machine-evaluated metrics to estimate whether the responses are reasonable given the input. These metrics, together with human evaluation, are used to analyze the performance of the four models in terms of different aspects; reinforcement learning and CycleGAN are shown to be very attractive.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.07196v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Investigation of Sentiment Controllable Chatbot" explores the limitations of conventional seq2seq chatbot models, which focus solely on finding sentences with the highest probabilities based on input sequences without considering the sentiment of the output sentences. To address this limitation, the authors investigate four different models: a persona-based model, reinforcement learning, a plug and play model, and CycleGAN. These models are all built upon the seq2seq model and aim to scale or adjust the sentiment of chatbot responses. In addition to developing these models, the authors also introduce machine-evaluated metrics to assess the reasonableness of chatbot responses given specific inputs. These metrics, along with human evaluation, are used to analyze and compare the performance of the four models across various aspects. The findings reveal that both reinforcement learning and CycleGAN show significant promise in terms of their ability to control sentiment in chatbot responses. This suggests that these two approaches may be particularly attractive for improving chatbot interactions by incorporating sentiment considerations. Overall, this research contributes to advancing sentiment controllability in chatbots by exploring different models and evaluating their performance using novel metrics. The results highlight potential avenues for enhancing user experiences with chatbots through more nuanced and contextually appropriate responses.
Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.