Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.03879v1

In the world of two-sided platform markets, cross-group externalities and network effects are well-studied factors that shape market structure and competition policy. However, within-group externalities arising from many-to-many matchings on a platform have received less attention. These externalities occur when the value to an agent of matching with another agent depends on the set of agents with which the latter is matched. Such effects are present in various settings where firms compete for individuals' attention or custom. In this paper, Quitzé Valenzuela-Stookey characterizes platform-optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within-group externalities. The author proves a set of comparative statics results for optimal matchings and demonstrates how these can be used to analyze welfare effects resulting from changes such as vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and modifications in the platform's information structure. The paper also explores market structure and regulation in two detailed applications. The first application involves monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform like Amazon. The second application examines how multi-channel video program distributors (MVPDs) negotiate transfer fees with television channels and bundle them to sell to individuals. Overall, this paper sheds light on an important yet understudied aspect of many-to-many matching platforms: within-group externalities. By providing insights into optimal matchings and their associated welfare implications under different scenarios, this research contributes to our understanding of competition policy in two-sided markets.

• - Cross-group externalities and network effects are well-studied factors in two-sided platform markets
• - Within-group externalities arising from many-to-many matchings on a platform have received less attention
• - Such externalities occur when the value to an agent of matching with another agent depends on the set of agents with which the latter is matched
• - The paper characterizes platform-optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within-group externalities
• - The author proves a set of comparative statics results for optimal matchings and demonstrates how these can be used to analyze welfare effects resulting from changes such as vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and modifications in the platform's information structure
• - The paper explores market structure and regulation in two detailed applications: monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform like Amazon, and how multi-channel video program distributors (MVPDs) negotiate transfer fees with television channels and bundle them to sell to individuals
• - This research sheds light on an important yet understudied aspect of many-to-many matching platforms: within-group externalities.

Summary: This paper talks about how people on a website or app can affect each other's value. It also looks at how the website or app can make the best matches between people. The paper shows how changes like when a company buys another company can affect the website or app. It also talks about two examples, one with Amazon and one with TV channels. Definitions- Cross-group externalities: When someone's actions affect someone else who is not in their group. - Network effects: When more people using a product makes it more valuable to everyone. - Within-group externalities: When someone's actions affect someone else who is in their same group. - Many-to-many matchings: When many people are trying to match with many other people. - Comparative statics results: How things change when something else changes. - Vertical integration: When a company buys another company that is in a different part of the supply chain. - Horizontal mergers: When two companies that do similar things merge together. - Market structure and regulation: How markets work and what rules they have.

Exploring Within-Group Externalities in Two-Sided Platform Markets

In the world of two-sided platform markets, cross-group externalities and network effects are well-studied factors that shape market structure and competition policy. However, within-group externalities arising from many-to-many matchings on a platform have received less attention. In this paper, Quitzé Valenzuela-Stookey characterizes platform optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within group externalities. This research sheds light on an important yet understudied aspect of two sided platforms: within group externalities. By providing insights into optimal matchings and their associated welfare implications under different scenarios, this research contributes to our understanding of competition policy in two sided markets.

What Are Within Group Externalities?

Within group externalities occur when the value to an agent of matching with another agent depends on the set of agents with which the latter is matched. These types of externalities are present in various settings where firms compete for individuals' attention or custom. For example, if a retail platform like Amazon has multiple sellers offering similar products at different prices then customers will be more likely to purchase from one seller over another based on who else is selling that product as well as its price point relative to other sellers’ offerings.

Characterizing Platform Optimal Matchings

Valenzuela Stookey's paper provides a characterization of platform optimal matchings in a general model of many to many matching with within group externalities by proving a set comparative statics results for these matchings and demonstrating how they can be used to analyze welfare effects resulting from changes such as vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and modifications in the platform's information structure.

Detailed Applications

The paper also explores market structure and regulation through detailed applications involving monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform like Amazon as well as multi channel video program distributors (MVPDs) negotiating transfer fees with television channels and bundling them for sale to individuals. Through these examples it becomes clear how changes made by platforms can affect both sides’ welfare outcomes due to within group externality considerations such as pricing strategies or bundling decisions made by either side or even changes made by third parties outside the scope of direct interactions between buyers/sellers or MVPDs/channels respectively .

Conclusion

Overall, this paper provides valuable insight into an often overlooked factor influencing two sided markets: within group externalities arising from many to many matchings occurring on platforms like Amazon or MVPDs negotiating transfer fees with television channels . By providing insights into optimal matchings and their associated welfare implications under different scenarios , this research contributes significantly towards our understanding not only about how these types of markets function but also what policies should be implemented so that all stakeholders benefit equally from any given situation .