Pre-trained language models as knowledge bases for Automotive Complaint Analysis

AI-generated keywords: Pre-trained language models Automotive Complaint Analysis BERT Technical Quality Issues Customer Feedback

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Viellieber and Aßenmacher explore the use of pre-trained language models like BERT for storing factual knowledge extracted from their pre-training corpus.
  • The research focuses on evaluating these models in identifying technical quality issues in unstructured customer feedback within the automotive industry.
  • The researchers designed domain-specific probes to assess the models' ability to recognize topics related to automotive complaints.
  • Experiments showed promising results, with most architectures achieving Precision@1 scores exceeding 60% and high accuracy levels for P@5 and P@10 metrics, reaching up to 90% in some cases.
  • The study highlights the potential of using advanced language models as comprehensive knowledge bases for structured analysis of customer feedback, particularly in industries like automotive.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: V. D. Viellieber, M. Aßenmacher

5 pages

Abstract: Recently it has been shown that large pre-trained language models like BERT (Devlin et al., 2018) are able to store commonsense factual knowledge captured in its pre-training corpus (Petroni et al., 2019). In our work we further evaluate this ability with respect to an application from industry creating a set of probes specifically designed to reveal technical quality issues captured as described incidents out of unstructured customer feedback in the automotive industry. After probing the out-of-the-box versions of the pre-trained models with fill-in-the-mask tasks we dynamically provide it with more knowledge via continual pre-training on the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) Complaints data set. In our experiments the models exhibit performance regarding queries on domain-specific topics compared to when queried on factual knowledge itself, as Petroni et al. (2019) have done. For most of the evaluated architectures the correct token is predicted with a $Precision@1$ ($P@1$) of above 60\%, while for $P@5$ and $P@10$ even values of well above 80\% and up to 90\% respectively are reached. These results show the potential of using language models as a knowledge base for structured analysis of customer feedback.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Dec. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2012.02558v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their research titled "Pre-trained language models as knowledge bases for Automotive Complaint Analysis," authors V. D. Viellieber and M. Aßenmacher delve into the capabilities of large pre-trained language models such as BERT to store factual knowledge extracted from their pre-training corpus. Building upon previous findings by Petroni et al. (2019), the authors focus on evaluating these models in the context of identifying technical quality issues within unstructured customer feedback in the automotive industry. To assess the ability of pre-trained models to recognize domain-specific topics related to automotive complaints, the researchers designed a series of probes tailored for this purpose. By employing fill-in-the-mask tasks and continually pre-training the models on data from the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) Complaints dataset, they aimed to enhance the models' understanding and performance in this specific domain. The experiments conducted by Viellieber and Aßenmacher revealed promising results, with most evaluated architectures achieving a Precision@1 (P@1) score exceeding 60%. Notably, for P@5 and P@10 metrics, accuracy levels soared well above 80% and even reached up to 90% in some instances. These outcomes underscore the potential utility of leveraging language models as comprehensive knowledge bases for structured analysis of customer feedback within industries like automotive. Overall, this study sheds light on how advanced language models can be effectively harnessed to extract valuable insights from unstructured textual data, offering new avenues for enhancing customer feedback analysis processes in specialized domains such as automotive complaints.
Created on 11 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.