Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach
AI-generated Key Points
- Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano and Federico Faggin explore consciousness and David Chalmers's 'hard problem'
- Propose a non-reductive psycho-informational solution viewing information as fundamental to experience within a system
- Argue for quantum nature of information due to privacy and entangling qualia states in constructing thoughts
- Develop quantum-information-based panpsychism framework where classical physics supervenes on quantum physics, which then supervenes on quantum information for consciousness
- Discuss internally experienced pure and definite quantum states vs. externally observed mixed epistemic states
- Introduce atomic quantum operations as mechanisms preserving purity in ontic state, corresponding to free will
- Address combination problem of panpsychism through purity of state and evolution resolving the issue
- Explore how quantum state evolution enables short-term buffering of experiences and transfers between classical and quantum information
- Touch upon long-term memory processes involving transitions between classical and quantum states
Authors: Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano, Federico Faggin
Abstract: We explore definite theoretical assertions about consciousness, starting from a non-reductive psycho-informational solution of David Chalmers's 'hard problem', based on the hypothesis that a fundamental property of 'information' is its experience by the supporting 'system'. The kind of information involved in consciousness needs to be quantum for multiple reasons, including its intrinsic privacy and its power of building up thoughts by entangling qualia states. As a result we reach a quantum-information-based panpsychism, with classical physics supervening on quantum physics, quantum physics supervening on quantum information, and quantum information supervening on consciousness. We then argue that the internally experienced quantum state, since it corresponds to a definite experience-not to a random choice-must be pure, and we call it ontic, in contrast with the state predictable from the outside (i.e. the state describing the knowledge of the experience from the point of view of an external observer) which we call epistemic and is generally mixed. Purity of the ontic state requires an evolution that is purity preserving, namely a so-called 'atomic' quantum operation. The latter is generally probabilistic, and its particular outcome is interpreted as the free will, which is unpredictable even in principle since quantum probability cannot be interpreted as lack of knowledge. The same purity of state and evolution allows solving the 'combination problem' of panpsychism. Quantum state evolution accounts for a short-term buffer of experience and contains itself quantum-to-classical and classical-to-quantum information transfers. Long term memory, on the other hand, is classical, and needs memorization and recall processes that are quantum-to-classical and classical-to-quantum, respectively...
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.