FakeBuster: A DeepFakes Detection Tool for Video Conferencing Scenarios
Authors: Vineet Mehta, Parul Gupta, Ramanathan Subramanian, Abhinav Dhall
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- FakeBuster is a standalone deep learning-based system for detecting manipulated videos during video conferencing and on social media platforms
- It can detect if a person's video has been manipulated or spoofed during a video conference, independent of specific software like Zoom or Skype
- FakeBuster uses a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict fakeness scores for each segment of a video
- The network is trained using diverse datasets including Deeperforensics, DFDC, VoxCeleb, and locally captured images tailored for video conferencing scenarios
- FakeBuster addresses the concern of DeepFake technology by providing real-time detection of manipulated videos
- It operates independently from specific video conferencing platforms, making it adaptable and versatile
- The use of a 3D CNN ensures accurate prediction of fakeness scores at the segment level
- Users can identify potential impostors or manipulated content during video conferences or on social media platforms
- FakeBuster leverages deep learning techniques and training on diverse datasets to combat DeepFakes effectively
- It ensures authenticity and trustworthiness in video conferencing scenarios and social media interactions.
Abstract: This paper proposes a new DeepFake detector FakeBuster for detecting impostors during video conferencing and manipulated faces on social media. FakeBuster is a standalone deep learning based solution, which enables a user to detect if another person's video is manipulated or spoofed during a video conferencing based meeting. This tool is independent of video conferencing solutions and has been tested with Zoom and Skype applications. It uses a 3D convolutional neural network for predicting video segment-wise fakeness scores. The network is trained on a combination of datasets such as Deeperforensics, DFDC, VoxCeleb, and deepfake videos created using locally captured (for video conferencing scenarios) images. This leads to different environments and perturbations in the dataset, which improves the generalization of the deepfake network.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.