Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2103.01183v1

The $\Lambda$CDM model, which describes the expansion of the universe, has been successful in explaining a wide range of cosmological data. However, recent advancements in observations have revealed discrepancies among key cosmological parameters within this model. One of the most significant tensions is the $4-6\sigma$ discrepancy between predictions of the Hubble constant ($H_0$) by early time probes within the $\Lambda$CDM model and independent determinations of $H_0$ from local measurements. The precision and consistency of data at both early and late times present challenges to finding a solution that can explain these observations. This demands a hypothesis with enough rigor to account for multiple observations, whether it involves new physics, unexpected large-scale structures, or unrelated errors. In this review, a thorough examination of the problem is presented. It includes a discussion of recent estimates of the Hubble constant and an overview of proposed theoretical solutions. Some models presented in this review have shown formal success by improving the fit to the data through additional degrees of freedom. These models restore agreement within $1-2\sigma$ between various datasets such as {\it Planck} 2018 (using CMB power spectra data), Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Pantheon Supernovae (SN) data, and R20 (the latest measurement by the SH0ES Team). It is important to note that reducing tension may not simply come from changing $H_0$, but also from increasing its uncertainty due to degeneracy with additional physics. This highlights the need for additional probes to further investigate these discrepancies. While no specific proposal stands out as highly likely or significantly better than others, several potential solutions are discussed in this review. These include models involving early or dynamical dark energy, neutrino interactions, interacting cosmologies, primordial magnetic fields, and modified gravity. Until a better alternative emerges, these models provide the best options for addressing the Hubble tension. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the Hubble tension problem and offers insights into potential theoretical solutions while emphasizing their limitations and uncertainties associated with them. The authors emphasize the need for continued research and exploration to better understand this fundamental cosmological discrepancy.

• - The $\Lambda$CDM model has been successful in explaining cosmological data
• - Recent advancements in observations have revealed discrepancies among key cosmological parameters within this model
• - One of the most significant tensions is the $4-6\sigma$ discrepancy between predictions of the Hubble constant ($H_0$) by early time probes and independent determinations of $H_0$ from local measurements
• - Precision and consistency of data at both early and late times present challenges to finding a solution that can explain these observations
• - Proposed theoretical solutions include new physics, unexpected large-scale structures, or unrelated errors
• - Some models have shown success in improving fit to data through additional degrees of freedom, restoring agreement within $1-2\sigma$
• - Reducing tension may come from changing $H_0$ or increasing its uncertainty due to degeneracy with additional physics
• - Additional probes are needed to further investigate these discrepancies
• - Potential solutions discussed include early or dynamical dark energy, neutrino interactions, interacting cosmologies, primordial magnetic fields, and modified gravity
• - No specific proposal stands out as highly likely or significantly better than others
• - Continued research and exploration are needed to better understand this fundamental cosmological discrepancy.

The $\\Lambda$CDM model is a way to explain how the universe works. Scientists have found some differences in the information they have collected about the universe. One of the biggest differences is in how fast the universe is expanding. There are different ideas for why this difference exists, like new physics or mistakes in the data. Scientists need to do more research to figure out what is going on and find a solution.

Exploring the Hubble Tension Problem: An Overview of Recent Developments

The $\Lambda$CDM model has been successful in explaining a wide range of cosmological data, but recent advancements have revealed discrepancies among key cosmological parameters within this model. One of the most significant tensions is the $4-6\sigma$ discrepancy between predictions of the Hubble constant ($H_0$) by early time probes within the $\Lambda$CDM model and independent determinations of $H_0$ from local measurements. This tension has become known as the “Hubble tension problem” and requires further exploration to understand its implications for our understanding of cosmology. In this review, we provide an overview of recent developments related to this problem. We discuss estimates of the Hubble constant from various datasets and explore potential theoretical solutions that may help explain these discrepancies. Our goal is to present a comprehensive analysis that highlights both successes and limitations associated with each proposed solution.

Estimates of The Hubble Constant

Recent estimates for $H_0$ come from multiple sources, including {\it Planck} 2018 (using CMB power spectra data), Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Pantheon Supernovae (SN) data, and R20 (the latest measurement by the SH0ES Team). These datasets have provided increasingly precise measurements for $H_0$, but they remain in disagreement with one another at a significance level ranging from 4-6 sigma depending on which dataset is used as reference. This discrepancy presents challenges to finding a solution that can explain all observations simultaneously. It demands a hypothesis with enough rigor to account for multiple observations, whether it involves new physics, unexpected large-scale structures, or unrelated errors.

Proposed Solutions

Several models have been proposed as potential solutions to address this issue; some have shown formal success by improving fit to data through additional degrees of freedom while others are still being explored further due their complexity or lack thereof in terms of observational evidence available so far. Some notable proposals include models involving early or dynamical dark energy, neutrino interactions, interacting cosmologies, primordial magnetic fields, and modified gravity theories such as Horndeski theory or f(R) gravity theories . These models restore agreement within 1-2 sigma between various datasets such as {\it Planck} 2018 (using CMB power spectra data), Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Pantheon Supernovae (SN) data, and R20 (the latest measurement by the SH0ES Team). However it is important to note that reducing tension may not simply come from changing $H_0$, but also from increasing its uncertainty due to degeneracy with additional physics included in these models beyond what was assumed in $\Lambda CDM$. This highlights need for additional probes such as weak lensing surveys or 21 cm intensity mapping experiments which could potentially offer more insight into nature underlying these tensions than what current datasets can provide alone .

Conclusion

Overall ,this review provides an extensive examination into problem posed by Hubble tension problem along with discussion about possible solutions currently being explored . While no specific proposal stands out yet , several potential solutions are discussed here which provide best options available right now towards addressing this fundamental cosmological discrepancy . Further research will be needed before any definitive conclusion can be made regarding nature behind observed discrepancies between different datasets measuring same quantity like Hubble constant .