Modeling Macroeconomic Variations After COVID-19
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The coronavirus pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on global economic forecasting models
- Time series properties have changed in ways that render many pre-COVID models inadequate
- COVID indicators can be used as controls to "de-COVID" data before estimation
- Economic uncertainty remains high despite real economic activity's recovery and receding COVID uncertainty by the end of 2020
- Dynamic responses of variables to shocks in a vector autoregression (VAR) similar in magnitude and shape to those identified before 2020 can be recovered by directly or indirectly modeling COVID and treating it as exogenous
- Responses to economic shocks are distinctly different from those to a COVID shock, which are much larger but shorter-lived
- Disentangling the two types of shocks is crucial in macroeconomic modeling post-COVID
- Updated models that account for the unique impact of pandemics on economies worldwide are needed.
Authors: Serena Ng
Abstract: The coronavirus is a global event of historical proportions and just a few months changed the time series properties of the data in ways that make many pre-covid forecasting models inadequate. It also creates a new problem for estimation of economic factors and dynamic causal effects because the variations around the outbreak can be interpreted as outliers, as shifts to the distribution of existing shocks, or as addition of new shocks. I take the latter view and use covid indicators as controls to 'de-covid' the data prior to estimation. I find that economic uncertainty remains high at the end of 2020 even though real economic activity has recovered and covid uncertainty has receded. Dynamic responses of variables to shocks in a VAR similar in magnitude and shape to the ones identified before 2020 can be recovered by directly or indirectly modeling covid and treating it as exogenous. These responses to economic shocks are distinctly different from those to a covid shock which are much larger but shorter lived. Disentangling the two types of shocks can be important in macroeconomic modeling post-covid.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.