The mean free path of ionizing photons at 5 < z < 6: evidence for rapid evolution near reionization
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- George D. Becker and colleagues present new direct measurements of the mean free path of ionizing photons, $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$.
- The study extends measurements up to $z \sim 6$ for the first time using QSO spectra from Keck ESI and VLT X-Shooter.
- The authors measure $\lambda_{\rm mfp} = 9.09^{+1.28}_{-1.60}$ proper Mpc and $0.75^{+0.65}_{-0.45}$ proper Mpc (68% confidence) at $z = 5.1$ and 6.0, respectively.
- Neglecting the proximity effect biases the result high by a factor of two or more at $z = 6$, suggesting rapid evolution in $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$ over $5 < z < 6$.
- The findings disfavor models in which reionization ended early enough that the IGM had time to fully relax hydrodynamically by $z = 6$.
- The authors' mean free path results are most consistent with late reionization models wherein the IGM is still 20% neutral at $z = 6$.
Authors: George D. Becker, Anson D'Aloisio, Holly M. Christenson, Yongda Zhu, Gábor Worseck, James S. Bolton
Abstract: The mean free path of ionizing photons, $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$, is a key factor in the photoionization of the intergalactic medium (IGM). At $z \gtrsim 5$, however, $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$ may be short enough that measurements towards QSOs are biased by the QSO proximity effect. We present new direct measurements of $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$ that address this bias and extend up to $z \sim 6$ for the first time. Our measurements at $z \sim 5$ are based on data from the Giant Gemini GMOS survey and new Keck LRIS observations of low-luminosity QSOs. At $z \sim 6$ we use QSO spectra from Keck ESI and VLT X-Shooter. We measure $\lambda_{\rm mfp} = 9.09^{+1.28}_{-1.60}$ proper Mpc and $0.75^{+0.65}_{-0.45}$ proper Mpc (68% confidence) at $z = 5.1$ and 6.0, respectively. The results at $z = 5.1$ are consistent with existing measurements, suggesting that bias from the proximity effect is minor at this redshift. At $z = 6.0$, however, we find that neglecting the proximity effect biases the result high by a factor of two or more. Our measurement at $z = 6.0$ falls well below extrapolations from lower redshifts, indicating rapid evolution in $\lambda_{\rm mfp}$ over $5 < z < 6$. This evolution disfavors models in which reionization ended early enough that the IGM had time to fully relax hydrodynamically by $z = 6$, but is qualitatively consistent with models wherein reionization completed at $z = 6$ or even significantly later. Our mean free path results are most consistent with late reionization models wherein the IGM is still 20% neutral at $z = 6$, although our measurement at $z = 6.0$ is even lower than these models prefer.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.