Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.02057v1

In this paper, the authors conduct an empirical study on training self-supervised Visual Transformers (ViT) in computer vision. They investigate several fundamental components for training self-supervised ViT and observe that instability is a major issue that degrades accuracy. The authors benchmark ViT results in MoCo v3 and several other self-supervised frameworks with ablations in various aspects. They compare ViT to standard convolutional networks, supervised versus self-supervised learning, and contrastive learning versus masked auto-encoding. The authors report positive evidence as well as challenges, open questions, and opportunities. One of the key findings is that with supervised pre-training on bigger datasets like ImageNet-21k or JFT-300M, ViT results are clearly better than those achieved through self-supervised pre-training when transferring to smaller datasets. This suggests potential future directions of performing self-supervised pre-training for big ViT models in bigger data. Overall, this study provides useful data points and experience for future research on closing the gap of pre-training between vision and language. The authors hope their work will help pave the way towards this direction by providing insights into how to train self-supervised Visual Transformers effectively.

• - The paper is about an empirical study on training self-supervised Visual Transformers (ViT) in computer vision.
• - Instability is a major issue that degrades accuracy in ViT training.
• - The authors benchmark ViT results in MoCo v3 and several other self-supervised frameworks with ablations in various aspects.
• - ViT is compared to standard convolutional networks, supervised versus self-supervised learning, and contrastive learning versus masked auto-encoding.
• - With supervised pre-training on bigger datasets like ImageNet-21k or JFT-300M, ViT results are clearly better than those achieved through self-supervised pre-training when transferring to smaller datasets.
• - This suggests potential future directions of performing self-supervised pre-training for big ViT models in bigger data.
• - The study provides useful data points and experience for future research on closing the gap of pre-training between vision and language.
• - The authors hope their work will help pave the way towards this direction by providing insights into how to train self-supervised Visual Transformers effectively.

Summary: This paper is about teaching computers to see things better using a special type of program called Visual Transformers. Sometimes, these programs can be unstable and not work well. The authors tested different ways to make them work better and found that training them with bigger datasets helped a lot. They also compared Visual Transformers to other types of programs and found that they can be really good if trained the right way. Definitions: - Empirical study: A research project where scientists collect data and analyze it to learn something new. - Self-supervised: A type of learning where a computer program learns from its own mistakes instead of being told what is right or wrong by humans. - Visual Transformers (ViT): A type of computer program used for image recognition tasks. - Benchmark: A standard or point of reference used for comparison. - Supervised learning: A type of learning where a computer program is taught by humans who provide labeled examples for the program to learn from. - Pre-training: Teaching a computer program before it starts working on specific tasks. - Data points: Pieces of information collected during an experiment or study. - Insights: New understanding or knowledge gained from studying something.

Exploring Self-Supervised Visual Transformers in Computer Vision

In recent years, the field of computer vision has seen a surge in the development of self-supervised visual transformers (ViT). These models are trained on unlabeled data and can be used to solve various tasks such as image recognition, object detection, and segmentation. In this paper, the authors conduct an empirical study on training self-supervised ViT and investigate several fundamental components for achieving optimal results.

Background

The use of deep learning models for computer vision tasks has been steadily increasing over the past few years. However, these models require large amounts of labeled data for supervised training which is often expensive or difficult to obtain. To address this issue, researchers have developed methods for training deep learning models using unlabeled data through self-supervision. This approach involves designing algorithms that can learn from unlabeled data without relying on labels or annotations from humans. One such method is contrastive learning which uses a pairwise comparison between two images to identify similar features between them. Another popular approach is masked auto-encoding which masks out parts of an image before attempting to reconstruct it using an encoder-decoder architecture.

Study Overview

In this paper, the authors conduct an empirical study on training self-supervised ViT in computer vision tasks with ablations in various aspects including supervised versus self-supervised learning and contrastive learning versus masked auto-encoding. The authors benchmark their results against MoCo v3 and other existing frameworks while also comparing ViT performance with standard convolutional networks (CNNs). They observe that instability during pre-training is one major issue that degrades accuracy when transferring to smaller datasets like ImageNet or CIFAR10/100.

Findings & Results

The authors report positive evidence as well as challenges when it comes to training self-supervised Visual Transformers effectively. One key finding was that with supervised pre-training on bigger datasets like ImageNet21k or JFT300M, ViT results were clearly better than those achieved through self-supervised pre-training when transferring to smaller datasets like ImageNet or CIFAR10/100 - suggesting potential future directions of performing supervised pre-training for big ViTs in larger datasets instead of relying solely on self supervision techniques alone . Additionally, they observed that different types of architectures had varying levels of success depending upon the task at hand - indicating further research into understanding how different architectures perform best under specific conditions may be beneficial going forward . Overall, this study provides useful insights into how to train effective Visual Transformers both through supervised and unsupervised approaches while also highlighting some open questions and opportunities for future research towards closing the gap between vision and language applications within AI systems . The authors hope their work will help pave the way towards this direction by providing valuable information about what works best under certain circumstances so others can build upon their findings more easily .