A Few Observations About State-Centric Online Propaganda
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Jukka Ruohonen presents a dataset from the East Stratcom Task Force (ESTF) to analyze pro-Kremlin propaganda between 2015 and early 2021.
- The observations are motivated by classical propaganda research and the ongoing transformation of media systems, rather than focusing solely on misinformation and disinformation.
- The propaganda targets both domestic and foreign audiences, with Russia, Ukraine, the United States, Germany, Poland, and the EU being the most frequently discussed countries and regions.
- Other conflict zones such as Syria also appear in the propaganda.
- Longitudinal trends indicate that most discussions decreased in volume after 2016 but increased again with the conflict in Ukraine.
- The themes discussed align with state-centric war propaganda and conflict zones but also include post-truth topics such as conspiracy theories, COVID-19, and fascism - typical of propaganda.
- This study provides valuable insights into how pro-Kremlin propaganda operates online and its potential impact on public opinion both domestically and internationally.
Authors: Jukka Ruohonen
Abstract: This paper presents a few observations about pro-Kremlin propaganda between 2015 and early 2021 with a dataset from the East Stratcom Task Force (ESTF), which is affiliated with the European Union (EU) but working independently from it. Instead of focusing on misinformation and disinformation, the observations are motivated by classical propaganda research and the ongoing transformation of media systems. According to the tentative results, (i) the propaganda can be assumed to target both domestic and foreign audiences. Of the countries and regions discussed, (ii) Russia, Ukraine, the United States, and within Europe, Germany, Poland, and the EU have been the most frequently discussed. Also other conflict regions such as Syria have often appeared in the propaganda. In terms of longitudinal trends, however, (iii) most of these discussions have decreased in volume after the digital tsunami in 2016, although the conflict in Ukraine seems to have again increased the intensity of pro-Kremlin propaganda. Finally, (iv) the themes discussed align with state-centric war propaganda and conflict zones, although also post-truth themes frequently appear; from conspiracy theories via COVID-19 to fascism -- anything goes, as is typical to propaganda.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.