AI summary · arXiv: 2104.08579v1 · cs.HC

SelectVisAR: Selective Visualisation of Virtual Environments in Augmented Reality

Robbe Cools, Jihae Han, Adalberto L. Simeone
Original paper · DOI 10.1145/3461778.3462096 Submitted to arXiv on 17 Apr. 2021 Published in Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (28 Jun. 2021) Conditionally Accepted to ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '21) License: CC BY 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • AR and VR technologies are increasingly popular for entertainment and practical purposes
  • SelectVisAR is a selective visualisation system for virtual environments in AR to address potential information surplus
  • SelectVisAR enables an AR spectator to perceive a co-present VR user in four distinct visualisation conditions: Interactive, Proximity, Everything, and Dollhouse
  • Two variables were investigated in two studies: the level of visual information and the effect of scale
  • Participants tended to prefer static visualisations over dynamic ones as they disliked lack of control over what they could see in VEs
  • Future work will involve improving these visualisations' generalisability into different contexts while applying them as an interactive simulation where both AR users and VR users interact collaboratively with elements from VEs.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Augmented Reality Virtual Reality SelectVisAR Visualisation Interaction

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The use of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies has become increasingly popular in recent years, with many applications emerging for both entertainment and practical purposes. To address the potential surplus of information that the AR user may face due to the two planes of information involved - physical and virtual - researchers have proposed SelectVisAR, a selective visualisation system for virtual environments (VEs) in AR. The SelectVisAR system enables an AR spectator to perceive a co-present VR user in four distinct visualisation conditions: Interactive, Proximity, Everything, and Dollhouse. The design uses a human-centric approach to information filtering by selectively visualising only parts of the VE related to the interactive range and possibilities of the VR user. Two variables were investigated in two studies: the level of visual information and the effect of scale. Regarding scale, smaller visualisations were found to provide a better overview of the VE but had the chance of decoupling users from their tasks. On the effect of scale, it was observed that filtering specific selections of VEs did not significantly affect how well people could identify events in VEs based on interactive range and possibilities. Participants tended to prefer static visualisations over dynamic ones as they disliked lack of control over what they could see in VEs. In terms of selective visualisations' influence on perception, participants identified VE events more accurately using Interactive or Context compared to Everything. While there were no significant differences proving that more selective visualisations improve focus statistically, mean values for competence were marginally higher for selective visualisations in this instance's 'bartender' VE. Future work will involve improving these visualisations' generalisability into different contexts while applying them as an interactive simulation where both AR users and VR users interact collaboratively with elements from VEs. Overall, SelectVisAR's selective visualisation system has potential to improve AR users' perception when interacting with co-present VR users; making it a promising solution for future AR and VR applications.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 1 free rewrite left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero Zotero guide
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide
Weekly letter The latest letter of its field, "Computing beyond AI this week" of 9 November 2026: Computing beyond AI this week: What noise reveals, and what guarantees conceal · Receive one by email for free

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close
    Extending the Egocentric Viewpoint in Situated Visualization Using Augmented Reality
    Nuno Cid Martins, Bernardo Marques, Paulo Dias et al. · 2023 · International Conference on Information Visualisation · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Augmented Reality (AR) has the ability to display and interact with additional information aligned with the real world and to support context-driven visualization techniques. Situated Visualization (SV) is a method to represent data in a context that encompasses all the visualizations that change their appearance based on context. Therefore, since AR is typically used so that the user can visualize extra information regarding the surrounding real world environment, this technology is well suited for SV and presents high potential in many situations, as are the cases of collaborative/assistive tasks in the maintenance area and supporting decision-making. AR-based visualizations are commonly c…

  2. Close
    [DC] Situated augmented reality: beyond the egocentric viewpoint
    N. Martins · 2021 · 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Augmented reality (AR) is well suited for situated visualization (SV), a method to represent data in context, with potential in many situations. Furthermore, AR-based SV poses challenges and research prospects. A vital one is the egocentric viewpoint limitation of the users, which reduces their ability to explore all the available information. To create new approaches that will overcome this limitation, this work began by understanding the relevance of viewpoints in typical AR-based SV scenarios, characterizing the approaches already proposed in order to tackle it. The new proposed approaches should be evaluated in different settings to improve and validate them, as well as propose guideline…

  3. Close
    Situated Visualization in Augmented Reality: Exploring Information Seeking Strategies
    Giuseppe Caggianese, Valerio Colonnese, Luigi Gallo · 2019 · International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems · cited 14 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    In recent years augmented reality applications have been increasingly demonstrating the requirement for an interaction with information related to and directly shown in the surrounding environment. Situated information is visualized in its semantic and spatial context, building up an environment enhanced by an information level that dynamically adapts to the production of the information and to the actions of the user. The exploration and manipulation of this type of data through see-through augmented reality devices still represents a challenging task. The development of specific interaction strategies capable to mitigating the current limitations of augmented reality devices is essential. …

  4. Close*
    Exploring augmented reality visualizations
    Antti Aaltonen, Juha Lehikoinen · 2006 · International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces · cited 7 times · Not summarized yet
  5. Close*
    Visualization Approaches in Augmented Reality Applications
    Markus Aleksy, Elina Vartiainen · 2015 · International Conference on Mobile Web Information Systems · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
  6. Close
    Behind the Scenes: Comparing X-Ray Visualization Techniques in Head-mounted Optical See-through Augmented Reality
    Uwe Gruenefeld, Yvonne Brück, Susanne CJ Boll · 2020 · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia · cited 10 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Locating objects in the environment can be a difficult task, especially when the objects are occluded. With Augmented Reality, we can alternate our perceived reality by augmenting it with visual cues or removing visual elements of reality, helping users to locate occluded objects. However, to our knowledge, it has not yet been evaluated which visualization technique works best for estimating the distance and size of occluded objects in optical see-through head-mounted Augmented Reality. To address this, we compare four different visualization techniques derived from previous work in a laboratory user study. Our results show that techniques utilizing additional aid (textual or with a grid) he…

  7. Close
    Augmented Reality Visualization Techniques for Attention Guidance to Out-of-View Objects: A Systematic Review
    Kelsey Quinn, Joseph L. Gabbard · 2024 · International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · cited 11 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Recent advancements in augmented reality (AR) hardware, software and application capabilities have introduced exciting benefits and advantages, especially in industrial and occupational fields. However, many new challenges have arisen with the increasing use of AR in real work settings, such as increased visual capture and attention demanded by graphics presented within a relatively small field of view (FOV) (as compared to users’ natural FOV). This systematic review paper addresses how to effectively use and design AR visualization techniques to cue objects located outside a user’s FOV. We posit that new visualization techniques are needed to cue out-of-view objects while maintaining user a…

  8. Close
    Investigating the Effects of Physical Landmarks on Spatial Memory for Information Visualisation in Augmented Reality
    Jiazhou Liu, K. Satriadi, Barrett Ens et al. · 2024 · International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · cited 13 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Augmented Reality (AR) is touted to be beneficial in supporting situated information display, allowing virtual information panels to be overlaid on real-world scenes. People must then use their spatial memory to navigate among these virtual panels effectively. While spatial memory has been studied in physical environments (wall displays) and virtual reality environments, there has been little research on how physical surroundings might affect memorisation of virtual content in a mixed environment like AR. Therefore, we provide the first AR study of spatial memory, comparing two different room settings with two different situated layouts of virtual targets on an abstract spatial memory task. …

Prior work it builds on

  1. Related Used in depth by this paper A method it uses
    Slice of Light: Transparent and Integrative Transition Among Realities in a Multi-HMD-User Environment
    Chiu-Hsuan Wang, Chia-En Tsai, Seraphina Yong et al. · 2020 · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · cited 46 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    This work presents Slice of Light, a visualization design created to enhance transparency and integrative transition between realities of Head-Mounted Display (HMD) users sharing the same physical environment. Targeted at reality-guests, Slice of Light's design enables guests to view other HMD users' interactions contextualized in their own virtual environments while allowing the guests to navigate among these virtual environments. In this paper, we detail our visualization design and the implementation. We demonstrate Slice of Light with a block-world construction scenario that involves a multi-HMD-user environment. VR developer and HCI expert participants were recruited to evaluate the sce…

  2. Close Used in depth by this paper
    Silhouette Games: An Interactive One-Way Mirror Approach to Watching Players in VR
    Andrey Krekhov, Daniel Preuß, Sebastian Cmentowski et al. · 2020 · ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · cited 12 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Watching others play is a key ingredient of digital games and an important aspect of games user research. However, spectatorship is not very popular in virtual reality, as such games strongly rely on one's feelings of presence. In other words, the head-mounted display creates a barrier between the player and the audience. We contribute an alternative watching approach consisting of two major components: a dynamic view frustum that renders the game scene from the current spectator position and a one-way mirror in front of the screen. This mirror, together with our silhouetting algorithm, allows seeing the player's reflection at the correct position in the virtual world. An exploratory survey …

  3. Close
    Information filtering for mobile augmented reality
    S. Julier, M. Lanzagorta, Y. Baillot et al. · 2000 · Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR 2000) · cited 268 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Augmented reality is a potentially powerful paradigm for annotating the (real) environment with computer-generated material. These benefits will be even greater when augmented reality systems become mobile and wearable. However, to minimize the problem of clutter and to maximize the effectiveness of the display, algorithms must be developed to select only the most important information for the user. In this paper, we describe a region-based information filtering algorithm. The algorithm takes account of the state of the user (location and intent) and the state of individual objects about which information can be presented. It can dynamically respond to changes in the environment and the user…

  4. Close*
    Towards Pervasive Augmented Reality: Context-Awareness in Augmented Reality
    Jens Grubert, T. Langlotz, S. Zollmann et al. · 2017 · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · cited 391 times · Not summarized yet
  5. Close
    Characterizing Asymmetric Collaborative Interactions in Virtual and Augmented Realities
    J. Grandi, H. Debarba, Anderson Maciel · 2019 · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces · cited 119 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    We present an assessment of asymmetric interactions in Collaborative Virtual Environments (CVEs). In our asymmetric setup, two co-located users interact with virtual 3D objects, one in immersive Virtual Reality (VR) and the other in mobile Augmented Reality (AR). We conducted a study with 36 participants to evaluate performance and collaboration aspects of pair work, and compare it with two symmetric scenarios, either with both users in immersive VR or mobile AR. To perform this experiment, we adopt a collaborative AR manipulation technique from literature and develop and evaluate a VR manipulation technique of our own. Our results indicate that pairs in asymmetric VR-AR achieved significant…

Papers that cite it

  1. Close Uses this paper in depth
    Blending Spaces: Cross-Reality Interaction Techniques for Object Transitions Between Distinct Virtual and Augmented Realities
    Robbe Cools, Augusto Esteves, A. Simeone · 2022 · International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · cited 28 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Cross-Reality (CR) involves interaction between different modalities and levels of immersion such as Virtual and Augmented Reality, as we explore in this paper. Whereas previous work assumed similarity between their respective Virtual and Augmented Environment (VE and AE), we explore the case in which VE and AE are distinct. This gives rise to novel and critical problems, such as how to visualise and interact with the other environment. In this context we investigate the fundamental interaction of transitioning an object across environments, to which we contribute five interaction techniques. Two are inspired by literature: Virtual Magic Lens and Binary Transition; while the other three are …

  2. Close
    A Scoping Survey on Cross-reality Systems
    Jonas Auda, Uwe Gruenefeld, S. Faltaous et al. · 2023 · ACM Computing Surveys · cited 94 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Immersive technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) empower users to experience digital realities. Known as distinct technology classes, the lines between them are becoming increasingly blurry with recent technological advancements. New systems enable users to interact across technology classes or transition between them—referred to as cross-reality systems. Nevertheless, these systems are not well understood. Hence, in this article, we conducted a scoping literature review to classify and analyze cross-reality systems proposed in previous work. First, we define these systems by distinguishing three different types. Thereafter, we compile a literature corpus of 306…

  3. Related Uses this paper in depth
    A Design Framework for Virtual Space based on Spectral Relationships
    Han-Lin Wang, Hirosuke Asahi, R. Shao et al. · 2026 · NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    Conventional Virtual Reality (VR) systems are structured around discrete, fixed worlds, requiring mechanisms such as portals or scene-blending to transition between worlds. This structure limits the creation of subjective, continuous spatial experiences. We introduce Spectral Space, a framework that augments the conventional 3-dimension virtual space with an additional non-spatial axis that we call frequency. Virtual entities are assigned with perceptual intensity functions along this axis, allowing their visibility to change smoothly as users adjust their position on the frequency axis. This enables multiple worlds to coexist in place and produces intermediate spaces that emerge from the gr…

  4. Close
    The Application of Augmented Reality Technology in Visual Communication Design
    Xiao-Hong Tian · 2025 · IET Computers & Digital Techniques · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    With the rapid development of computer science and information technology, augmented reality (AR) technology has been widely used in the field of visual communication design. AR is needed in visual communication design because it allows blending the real world with the virtual one, which cannot be done with the help of traditional 2D design methods. This paper aims to enhance the application of reality technology in visual communication design and evaluate its effect and advantages and disadvantages through experiments. In this paper, AR technology is used to virtually superimpose images, videos, and other elements in the real scene to achieve colorful visual communication effects. Meanwhile…

  5. Related
    Mobile Displays for Cross-Reality Interactions between Virtual and Physical Realities
    Robbe Cools, A. Simeone · 2021 · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    We present two use cases of mobile displays in cross-reality interactions between users immersed in Virtual Reality (VR) and users present in the Physical Reality (PR) by using the mobile display to show select artefacts of interest. The first use case is the “Substitutional Display” where a display serves as a passive haptic for an artefact. Both VR and PR users can then move the artefact by physically moving the display. The second use case is a “Virtual Artefact Handover” which allows the VR user to pass artefacts onto the PR user’s display. We envision this handover as a natural interaction where the VR user moves the artefact onto a virtual proxy of the display the PR user is holding, a…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

Updated on 6 November 2026.

The illustrated guide to the papers around a paper

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.