Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2104.14287v1

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the energy requirements and emissions associated with electric vehicles (EVs) compared to conventional fuel-driven cars. The objective is to assess the potential of EVs in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050, as recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). A simple analytical procedure based on open literature data was used to determine the embodied energy and emissions of almost all aspects of putting together an EV and operating it. The results show that significant technological developments are required for EVs to become environmentally better placed compared to combustion engine-based cars. The combined embodied energy for Nd- and Dy-metals production, which are required in electric motors and battery assembly for 150 million cars projected to be on the road in 2050, is approximately 1500 TWh, with CO2 emissions exceeding 600 MT. This includes carbon intensity of electrical energy required to run these EVs. In comparison, the projected emissions due to fossil fuels, gasoline production, as well as burning it in combustion engines is only 412 MT, far less than that due to EVs. The main contributor to emissions from EVs is the battery assembling process which releases around 379 MT of CO2-e gases. Both EVs and combustion engine vehicles' emissions scale linearly with the number of vehicles indicating that a breakeven is not possible with currently available manufacturing technologies. The study highlights that while progress towards emission control may be stalling globally, it needs acceleration given climate change's severity. Therefore, this type of analysis becomes imperative in assessing how much progress has been made so far towards achieving sustainable transportation systems. In conclusion, this study emphasizes that significant technological advancements are necessary for EVs' environmental sustainability compared to conventional fuel-driven cars. It also suggests exploring alternative materials for batteries or developing more efficient battery manufacturing processes to reduce emissions. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers in developing strategies for sustainable transportation systems that align with global climate goals.

• - The study compares the energy requirements and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) to conventional fuel-driven cars.
• - The objective is to assess the potential of EVs in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050.
• - A simple analytical procedure based on open literature data was used to determine the embodied energy and emissions of almost all aspects of putting together an EV and operating it.
• - Significant technological developments are required for EVs to become environmentally better placed compared to combustion engine-based cars.
• - The combined embodied energy for Nd- and Dy-metals production, which are required in electric motors and battery assembly for 150 million cars projected to be on the road in 2050, is approximately 1500 TWh, with CO2 emissions exceeding 600 MT.
• - The main contributor to emissions from EVs is the battery assembling process which releases around 379 MT of CO2-e gases.
• - Both EVs and combustion engine vehicles' emissions scale linearly with the number of vehicles indicating that a breakeven is not possible with currently available manufacturing technologies.
• - The study highlights that progress towards emission control may be stalling globally, it needs acceleration given climate change's severity.
• - Significant technological advancements are necessary for EVs' environmental sustainability compared to conventional fuel-driven cars.
• - It suggests exploring alternative materials for batteries or developing more efficient battery manufacturing processes to reduce emissions.
• - The findings can inform policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers in developing strategies for sustainable transportation systems that align with global climate goals.

SummaryThis study looks at electric cars and how they can help reduce pollution. They compared electric cars to regular cars that use gas. They found that making the batteries for electric cars creates a lot of pollution, but if we make better batteries or use different materials, it could be better for the environment. We need to keep working on making electric cars better so they can help stop global warming. Definitions- Energy requirements: The amount of energy needed to do something. - Emissions: Gases or particles released into the air, often from burning fuel. - Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: Gases that trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere and contribute to climate change. - Embodied energy: The total amount of energy used in making a product, including all stages from extracting raw materials to manufacturing and transportation. - Technological developments: Improvements or advancements in technology. - CO2 emissions: Carbon dioxide released into the air, which contributes to climate change. - Linearly: In a straight line or direct relationship between two things. - Breakeven: When two things are equal or balanced. - Sustainability: Using resources in a way that does not harm the environment and can continue long-term. - Policymakers: People who make decisions about laws and regulations. - Stakeholders: People or groups with an interest in something, such as a company or industry. - Strategies: Plans for achieving goals or objectives.

Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Energy Requirements and Emissions

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has recommended limiting global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050, and electric vehicles (EVs) are seen as a key component in achieving this goal. However, EVs come with their own set of energy requirements and emissions that must be taken into account when assessing their potential for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This article will provide an overview of a recent research paper which conducted a comprehensive analysis of the energy requirements and emissions associated with EVs compared to conventional fuel-driven cars.

Methodology

The study used a simple analytical procedure based on open literature data to determine the embodied energy and emissions of almost all aspects of putting together an EV and operating it. The results were then compared to those from combustion engine-based cars in order to assess the potential for EVs in reducing GHG emissions.

Results

The results show that significant technological developments are required for EVs to become environmentally better placed compared to combustion engine-based cars. The combined embodied energy for Nd- and Dy-metals production, which are required in electric motors and battery assembly for 150 million cars projected to be on the road in 2050, is approximately 1500 TWh, with CO2 emissions exceeding 600 MT. This includes carbon intensity of electrical energy required to run these EVs. In comparison, the projected emissions due to fossil fuels, gasoline production, as well as burning it in combustion engines is only 412 MT - far less than that due to EVs. The main contributor to emissions from EVs is the battery assembling process which releases around 379 MT of CO2-e gases. Both EVs and combustion engine vehicles' emissions scale linearly with the number of vehicles indicating that a breakeven is not possible with currently available manufacturing technologies.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes that significant technological advancements are necessary for EVs' environmental sustainability compared to conventional fuel-driven cars if we want them to play an important role in meeting global climate goals by 2050. It also suggests exploring alternative materials for batteries or developing more efficient battery manufacturing processes so as reduce overall GHG emission levels from transportation systems worldwide . These findings can inform policymakers, industry stakeholders, researchers when developing strategies towards sustainable transportation systems aligned with global climate objectives